For faster navigation, this Iframe is preloading the Wikiwand page for
巴克訴貝爾案 .
巴克訴貝爾案 辩论：1927年4月22日 案件全名 嘉莉·巴克 州立癲癇患者及弱智者收容所 引註案號 274 U.S. 200 47 S. Ct. 584; 71 L. Ed.
既往案件 Buck v. Bell, 143 Va. 310, 130 S.E. 法庭判决 法院認定「為了州的保護及健康」授權強制絕育 的法令合憲，並維持維吉尼亞州最高法院 法庭意见 多数意见 霍姆斯 不同意见 巴特勒 适用法条 美国宪法第十四修正案 被取代
史金納訴奧克拉荷馬州案
巴克訴貝爾案 （Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927)）是美國一個關於優生學 和強制絕育 的案件。在此判決中，美國最高法院 允許弗吉尼亚州根據其1924年通過的《优生绝育法》对因奸成孕的凱莉·巴克施行强制绝育，这位单身母亲被诊断为“智力低下”，[1] [2] [3] [4]
^ （英）韦罗妮克·莫捷著；刘露译,牛津通识读本 性存在,译林出版社,2015.08,第93页
^ （英）苏珊-玛丽·格兰特著；董晨宇，成思译,剑桥美国史 插图版,新星出版社,2019.08,第340-341页
^ 沈东著,生育选择引论 辅助生殖技术的社会学视角,辽宁人民出版社,2011.02,第327页
^ Kaelber, Lutz. Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States - Virginia . Lutz Kaelber, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Vermont. [2013-05-14 ] . （原始内容存档 于2023-06-25）.
公民條款
Slaughter-House Cases (1873)Elk v. Wilkins (1884)美国诉黄金德案 (1898)Perez v. Brownell (1958)Afroyim v. Rusk (1967)Rogers v. Bellei (1971)Saenz v. Roe (1999)
經濟實質正當程序
Mugler v. Kansas (1887)Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897)洛克纳诉纽约州案 (1905)Coppage v. Kansas (1915)Adams v. Tanner (1917)Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1923) 美國隱私權法
Meyer v. Nebraska (1923)Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)格里斯沃爾德訴康乃狄克州案 (1965)Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972)Doe v. Bolton (1973)羅訴韋德案 (1973)Bowers v. Hardwick (1986)Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989)Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)劳伦斯诉德克萨斯州案 (2003)Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (2016) 墮胎權
United States v. Vuitch (1971)Doe v. Bolton (1973)羅訴韋德案 (1973)H. L. v. Matheson (1981)City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health (1983)Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989)Hodgson v. Minnesota (1990)Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)Stenberg v. Carhart (2000)Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of New England (2006)冈萨雷斯诉卡哈特案 (2007)Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (2016)Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. (2019)June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo (2020) 民權責任第三執行法
Monroe v. Pape (1961)McNeese v. Board of Educ. (1963)Pierson v. Ray (1967)Jenkins v. McKeithen (1969)Scheuer v. Rhodes (1974)Wood v. Strickland (1975)O'Connor v. Donaldson (1975)Paul v. Davis (1976)Imbler v. Pachtman (1976)Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York (1978)Procunier v. Navarette (1978)Owen v. City of Independence (1980)Harlow v. Fitzgerald (1982)Felder v. Casey (1988)Will v. Michigan Department of State Police (1989)Gonzaga University v. Doe (2002)Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community (2003)City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams (2005)Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee (2009)Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009)Los Angeles County v. Humphries (2010)Connick v. Thompson (2011) 其它
Holden v. Hardy (1898)Muller v. Oregon (1908)巴克訴貝爾案 (1927)Powell v. Alabama (1932)West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937)NAACP v. Alabama (1958)格里斯沃爾德訴康乃狄克州案 (1965)Loving v. Virginia (1967)Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)In re Winship (1971)Kolender v. Lawson (1983)Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)Troxel v. Granville (2000)Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. (2009)奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案 (2015)
United States v. Cruikshank (1876)Pace v. Alabama (1883)Civil Rights Cases (1883)Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)普莱西诉弗格森案 (1896)Buchanan v. Warley (1917)Lum v. Rice (1927)Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942)Perez v. Sharp (1948)Goesaert v. Cleary (1948)Shelley v. Kraemer (1948)Sipuel v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla. (1948)Sweatt v. Painter (1950)McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950)布朗訴托皮卡教育局案 (1954)Hernandez v. Texas (1954)Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County (1964)Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966)Loving v. Virginia (1967)Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971)Guey Heung Lee v. Johnson (1971)里德诉里德案 (1971)Frontiero v. Richardson (1973)Craig v. Boren (1976)Milliken v. Bradley (1974)Rostker v. Goldberg (1981)Plyler v. Doe (1982)Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan (1982)合众国诉弗吉尼亚州案 (1996)Romer v. Evans (1996)格鲁特诉布林格案 (2003)Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案 (2015)National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System (S.D. Tex, 2019)
{{bottomLinkPreText}}
{{bottomLinkText}}
This page is based on a Wikipedia article written by
contributors (read /edit ).CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
{{current.index+1}} of {{items.length}}
Thanks for reporting this video!
This browser is not supported by Wikiwand :(
An extension you use may be preventing Wikiwand articles from loading properly.HTTPS Everywhere or you're unable to access any article on Wikiwand, please consider switching to HTTPS (https ://www.wikiwand.com).
An extension you use may be preventing Wikiwand articles from loading properly.Ad-Blocker , it might have mistakenly blocked our content.
You will need to temporarily disable your Ad-blocker to view this page.
✕
This article was just edited, click to reload
Please click Add in the dialog above
Please click Allow in the top-left corner, Install Now in the dialog
Please click Open in the download dialog, Install
Please click the "Downloads" icon in the Safari toolbar, open the first download in the list, Install
{{::$root.activation.text}}
Follow Us
Don't forget to rate us
Oh no, there's been an error
Please help us solve this error by emailing us at
support@wikiwand.com
Let us know what you've done that caused this error, what browser you're using, and whether you have any special extensions/add-ons installed.
Thank you!
Presentation by Adam Cohen on Imbeciles, March 8, 2016, C-SPAN