For faster navigation, this Iframe is preloading the Wikiwand page for Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan.

Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan

Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan
Nama panjang:
  • Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan dan Perlakuan atau Hukuman Lain yang Kejam, Tidak Manusiawi, dan Merendahkan Martabat Manusia
JenisKonvensi HAM
Dirancang18 Desember 2002[1]
Ditandatangani18 Desember 2002
LokasiNew York
Efektif22 Juni 2006[1]
Syarat20 ratifikasi[2]
Penanda tangan75[1]
Pihak88[1]
PenyimpanSekjen PBB[3]
BahasaArab, Tionghoa, Inggris, Prancis, Rusia dan Spanyol[4]

Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan dan Perlakuan atau Hukuman Lain yang Kejam, Tidak Manusiawi, dan Merendahkan Martabat Manusia (umum disebut sebagai Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan) adalah sebuah perjanjian yang menjadi pelengkap bagi Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Menentang Penyiksaan. Perjanjian tersebut mendirikan sistem inspeksi internasional untuk tempat-tempat penahanan yang didasarkan pada sistem yang telah ada di Eropa sejak 1987.

Referensi

[sunting | sunting sumber]
  1. ^ a b c d Kesalahan pengutipan: Tag <ref> tidak sah; tidak ditemukan teks untuk ref bernama untc
  2. ^ OPCAT Diarsipkan 2008-05-05 di Wayback Machine., Article 28. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
  3. ^ OPCAT Diarsipkan 2008-05-05 di Wayback Machine., Article 27. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.
  4. ^ OPCAT Diarsipkan 2008-05-05 di Wayback Machine., Article 37. Retrieved on 30 December 2008.

Pranala luar

[sunting | sunting sumber]
Instrumen hak asasi manusia internasional
Deklarasi, manifesto, dan resolusi
Perjanjian hukum internasional
Perjanjian regional
Putusan pengadilan
  • Handyside v. United Kingdom (1976)
  • Lovelace v. Canada (1981)
  • Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom (1981)
  • Guerrero v. Colombia (1982)
  • Baboeram-Adhin v, Suriname (1985)
  • Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras (1988)
  • Müller v. Switzerland (1988)
  • Kitok v. Sweden (1988)
  • K. v. Austria (1990)
  • Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada (1990)
  • Toonen v. Australia (1992)
  • Castells v. Spain (1992)
  • Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland (1992)
  • Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria (1994)
  • McCann v. United Kingdom (1995)
  • Goodwin v. United Kingdom (1996)
  • Kelly v. United Kingdom (1997)
  • Osman v. United Kingdom (1998)
  • Güleç v. Turkey (1998)
  • Amnesty International v. Zambia (1999)
  • Avocats Sans Frontières v. Burundi (2000)
  • Forum of Conscience v. Sierra Leone (2000)
  • Union Nationale des Syndicate Autonomes du Senegal v. Senegal (2000)
  • Barrios Altos v. Peru (2001)
  • VgT v. Switzerland (2001)
  • Lawyers for Human Rights v. Swaziland (2002)
  • Pretty v. United Kingdom (2002)
  • SERAC v. Nigeria (2002)
  • Law Office of Ghazi Suleiman v. Sudan (2003)
  • Interights et al. v. Botswana (2003)
  • Centre for Minority Rights Development et al. v. Kenya (2003)
  • Purohit and Moore v. The Gambia (2003)
  • Curtis Francis Doebbler v. Sudan (2003)
  • Association Pour la Sauvegarde de la Paix au Burundi v. Tanzania and Others (2003)
  • Dem. Rep. Congo v. Burundi and Others (2003)
  • Krone Verlag v. Austria (2003)
  • Garaudy v. France (2003)
  • Broniowski v. Poland (2004)
  • Öneryıldız v. Turkey (2004)
  • Editions Plon (Societe) v. France (2004)
  • Chauvy v. France (2004)
  • Selisto v Finland (2004)
  • Von Hannover v. Germany (2004)
  • K.L. v. Peru (2005)
  • Almonacid-Arellano v. Chile (2006)
  • Open Society Justice Initiative v. Cameroon (2006)
  • Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum v. Zimbabwe (2006)
  • Yildirim v. Austria (2007)
  • Behrami v. France (2007)
  • Rumpf v. Germany (2010)
  • A, B and C v. Ireland (2010)
  • Singh v. France (2011)
  • Gelman v. Uruguay (2011)
  • Interights v. Egypt (2011)
  • Association “21 December 1989” and Others v. Romania (2011)
  • Vejdeland v. Sweden (2012)
  • Sarayaku v. Ecuador (2012)
  • Länsman v. Finland (2013)
  • Câmpeanu v. Romania (2014)
  • Umuhoza v. Rwanda (2017)
  • E.S. v. Austria (2018)
  • M'Bala M'Bala v. France (2019)
  • Magyar Jeti Zrt v. Hungary (2019)
  • Konaté v. Burkina Faso (2020)
  • Rashkin v. Russia (2020)
  • Lilliendahl v. Iceland (2020)
  • Lhaka Honhat v. Argentina (2020)
{{bottomLinkPreText}} {{bottomLinkText}}
This page is based on a Wikipedia article written by contributors (read/edit).
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
Cover photo is available under {{::mainImage.info.license.name || 'Unknown'}} license. Cover photo is available under {{::mainImage.info.license.name || 'Unknown'}} license. Credit: (see original file).
Protokol Opsional Konvensi Menentang Penyiksaan
Listen to this article

This browser is not supported by Wikiwand :(
Wikiwand requires a browser with modern capabilities in order to provide you with the best reading experience.
Please download and use one of the following browsers:

✕
This article was just edited, click to reload
This article has been deleted on Wikipedia (Why?)

Back to homepage

Please click Add in the dialog above
Please click Allow in the top-left corner,
then click Install Now in the dialog
Please click Open in the download dialog,
then click Install
Please click the "Downloads" icon in the Safari toolbar, open the first download in the list,
then click Install
{{::$root.activation.text}}

Install Wikiwand

Install on Chrome Install on Firefox
Don't forget to rate us

Tell your friends about Wikiwand!

Gmail Facebook Twitter Link

Enjoying Wikiwand?

Tell your friends and spread the love:
Share on Gmail Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Buffer

Our magic isn't perfect

You can help our automatic cover photo selection by reporting an unsuitable photo.

This photo is visually disturbing This photo is not a good choice

Thank you for helping!


Your input will affect cover photo selection, along with input from other users.

X

Get ready for Wikiwand 2.0 🎉! the new version arrives on September 1st! Don't want to wait?