Could you explain why you tagged Lost Energy as an advert? I agree that it's a messy article, at least at this time, having virtually no prose, but that's no reason to tag it for speedy deletion. Also, traditionally, speedy deletion is only used for new articles. If you're unfamiliar with our criteria for speedy deletion, please refrain from tagging new articles until you get a good idea for it. Thanks for your enthusiasm, ceranthor 20:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that the Lost Energy article is nothing but blatant advertising. The article on wikipedia brings nothing more than the company's product page, no mention in the media, and no other information. Shade00a00 (talk) 16:55, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]