Any reason why slapping it with a POV tag? It's pretty useless without a reason. --Howard the Duck 14:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't put anything on the "term end" parameter of incumbent government officials. We don't know the exact date when the term may end. The politician might resign or die while in office for all we know. --bluemask ^(talk) 01:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to repeat what I posted before. --bluemask ^(talk) 17:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Benigno Aquino.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the ((GFDL-self)) tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use in|article name)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. bluemask ^(talk) 10:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A ((prod)) template has been added to the article Koalisyon ng mga Pulitikong na Maka-Administrasyon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with ((db-author)). Jesse Viviano 16:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]