Hello, Pshla619! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jojhutton (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This is a biased edit below because you took out valuable facts about the Angels fan appreciation and attendance for no good reason. There was facts stated and also a nice introduction to how the sections tone should be written and directed for people who have no clue about this, like you!

"Angels are not known for loyal fans. Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox, Cubs, Cardinals have loyal fans. And the Dodgers are not "closer to L.A." The Dodgers play in L.A.)" <---How does this have anything to do with an encyclopedia edit? This is all opinion!

And if you listened to the section written you would understand that i was explaining that the Dodgers have a location closer to L.A. than the Angels do. It wasn't anything about they play in LA or they don't.

"shown through the teams great fan following seen in the following section...they have drawn 3 million plus fans to the stadium for eight years straight"

Above is an example of what you took out which was an intro to the fan appreciation section merely stating that it "can be" seen that the Angels have a loyal fan presence in the following stated facts about achievements by the Angels. What a reader will get from this is stats that can let the reader see ballpark figures of fan appreciation, should i put comparable stats of other ballparks to make it seem less opinionated?