You are in danger of violating WP:3RR and if you revert again you may be blocked. --Ideogram 21:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know that. Thanks for your so kind reminding. You know the rules, ROC will replace Taiwan eventually, according to the stupid rules. --Morphi 21:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no rule that says ROC should replace Taiwan.--Jerrypp772000 21:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not in direct ways, but Taiwan cannot be described as a nation.

"Taiwan should not be described either as an independent nation or as a part of the People's Republic of China. "

"Wikipedia should merely state the de facto situation that Taiwan is governed by an independent government/state/regime called the "Republic of China."

Likewise, one should write "one must be an ROC citizen to vote in the ROC presidential election" as opposed to "one must be a Taiwanese citizen to vote in the Taiwanese presidential election."

So, Acer is Taiwan-based... violated

Acer is the Republic of China-based... rules --Morphi 22:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan isn't a nation politically. It is, however, a common name for the Republic of China. For non-political articles, we wouldn't use ROC.--Jerrypp772000 22:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, "Taiwan cannot be described as a nation", in any articles, "ROC" should be used.

Though Taiwan is governed by an independent government/state/regime called the "Republic of China." Sorry, this is Wikipedia's policy. If you disagree with them, fight them. I am just following the policy --Morphi 22:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not policy. Even the page you linked to is labelled a "guideline" and not policy. And I could easily get you blocked for your last edit to the article, but I won't since I don't think it would be productive at this time. --Ideogram 22:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I don't really care. There are thousands of page with ROC. I am just trying to make people notice this "evil." --Morphi 22:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) if you further violate WP:POINT I will get you blocked. --Ideogram 22:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know, in the most of time, I follow the wikipedia policy. I don't think that I've ever violate WP:POINT. Maybe it can call it a backdoor hole, many dirty things can be done legally. Maybe next time, more friends of mine will come. Do you stand by us to break the rule? :-) --Morphi 22:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do whatever you want. We'll block you if you are disruptive. --Ideogram 22:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"...more friends of mine will come." Well, that would be illegal in Wikipedia.--Jerrypp772000 23:00, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

friends are not allow here in wikipedia?! What a place! XD --Morphi 23:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If your friends are disruptive we will block them too. Have fun wasting your time. --Ideogram 23:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about us. We are all revolutionists with romance. --Morphi 23:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is worried about you. --Ideogram 23:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The best thing you can do now is to stop being disruptive, and discuss.--Jerrypp772000 23:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. I'll be back to discuss with you about the Acer page. :-) --Morphi 23:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too late, should have self-reverted.--Jerrypp772000 23:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morphi, you have been blocked for 24 hours for 3RR violation on Acer (company). Please carefully review our WP:3RR policy, I hope you decide to play by the rules from now on. Thanks, Crum375 23:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, why don't you just discuss it here. Yeah, say what you have to say.--Jerrypp772000 23:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yup...so I said in 24hrs, right, Jerry!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Morphi (talk • contribs)

You can still edit your own talk page even when you're blocked.--Jerrypp772000 23:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]