Hello, Morekar! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 14:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Me Shivaji Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 14:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make new articles for some Marathi Movies like Pushpak Vimaan, Takatak (film), Takatak 2, Daagadi Chawl 2, Karkhanisanchi Wari? 49.32.184.36 (talk) 06:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think other articles can be made apart from 'Takatak' movie. Morekar (talk) 07:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just like Kothare Vision, can you make articles for Marathi production houses such as Vajra Production, Trrump Carrd Production, Iris Production, Someel Creation, Sobo Films, Piccolo Films, Potadi Entertainment? 49.33.208.141 (talk) 07:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Inspector Mahesh Jadhav, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. Also, please read WP:NOTPLOT. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hii Morekar, Happy and proud to see that you update biographies about Marathi artist on wikipedia. Can you create One Marathi Actor Biography name Vishwanath Kulkarni ? I will provide you all details about his articles,projects etc..

He is currently doing colors marathi serial Yog yogeshwar Jay shankar as Bhasme kaka. Mulshi Pattern Mai (TV series) Rudra: The Edge of Darkness these are his big projects and he also worked in 17 serials too. You can check his IMDB PROFILE

ActorKVishwanath (talk) 15:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any response from you sir ! ActorKVishwanath (talk) 04:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damn It Ani Barach Kahi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damn It Ani Barach Kahi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AShiv1212 (talk) 06:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Indian films of 2017 instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Indian films of 2017 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tatya Vinchu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatya Vinchu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shivani Baokar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DreamRimmer (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inspector Mahesh Jadhav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 01:36, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ravrambha, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop making hasty generalizations in articles. A handful of reviews is NOT enough to start making broad generalizations as you did. Ravensfire (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gadbad Ghotala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dilip Prabhavalkar as Tatya Vinchu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tatya Vinchu Zapatlela.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding photographs of famous Marathi people.This can be a contentious issue at times and it is good idea to discuss this on Talkpage of the article before adding them.Case in point is Lata Mangeshkar, and sachin Tendulkar.Some people claim them to be of Goan origin, and therefore not Marathi. We both know that Marathi is their first language but on Wikipedia one has the right to challenge anything that is not totally clearcut.I hope you get my point. Thanks. Jonathansammy (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the origin of some people here is from another place, their ethnicity is Marathi. Ex- Mukesh Ambani's origin is Maharashtra or Mumbai but he may be added in Gujarati people.

This page is not for people of Maharashtra but for people who are ethnically Marathi. Also if you check any Wikipedia featured or Good articles on different peoples from around the world, you will not find any galleries of their respective famous people. See here [1] and [2] and If the goal is get to Marathi people page to Good article or featured article status, then I recommend you remove this gallery.I myself had added a lot of images many years ago when I was a new editor but these were deleted later on. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Although this is your talkpage, please sign your posts. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it is regarding this edit. boxofficebusiness.in is not a reliable source, the other one PINKVILLA is per WP:ICTF and WP:ICTFFAQ. You need to revert your changes or find a reliable source in support of your changes/ RS sources are listed in WP:ICTF and WP:ICTFFAQ. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Moreker. Consider adding wikipedia pages for the movies Abhaas (1997) Bijaya Jena and Murali (malayalam actor) and Akshay Anand starrer and NFDC's Dance Like a Man (2004) Shobhana, Anoushka Shankar, Sameer Soni starrer Arjunsoumithran (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pistulya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zoom TV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. Thank you for your work on Aathvani. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|DreamRimmer)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 13:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are largely cast lists/database content. More evidence of significant coverage would be helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dharla Tar Chavtay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:28, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jailer (2023 Tamil film)

added a link pointing to Business Today

List of Indian films of 2023

added a link pointing to Business Today

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aayatya Gharat Gharoba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aayatya Gharat Gharoba. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 00:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The websites that you used in your references use Manobala Vijayabalan as their reference which is considered to be unreliable as per this discussion. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 11:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. Thank you for your work on Vedat Marathe Veer Daudle Saat. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nagol0929 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dharla Tar Chavtay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nagol0929 (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalat Nakalat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. Thank you for your work on Baap Manus. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add reception section.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|DreamRimmer)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 12:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't link country and language in infoboxes unless they are minor or relatively unknown. It's considered overlinking. The template docs have more information. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Boyz 4. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and Fails WP:NFF, needs sufficient coverage to show the production is notable or wait until it is released. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 17:38, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Boyz 4 film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Boyz 4. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and still fails WP:NFF. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (talk) 14:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFF requires significant coverage of the film's production. That's not in the current version of the article. Ravensfire (talk) 14:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Boyz 4 film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hie Morekar, can you create an article on Ek Gaadi Baaki Anaadi because that film was very famous and use various effects in 80s when technical department was not very strong. I saw that you're interested in Marathi related stuffs that's why I asked you about that. Last but not the least even the film was also made in hindi as Taarzan- The Wonder Car. 2409:40C0:1069:4647:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 19:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

Please fix the references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inspector Mahesh Jadhav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I found three reliable and independent sources to the subject but didn't find significant coverage about him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inspector Mahesh Jadhav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 08:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I noticed that you recently removed content from Draft:Inspector Mahesh Jadhav without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 12:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boyz 4, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 02:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inspector Mahesh Jadhav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– DreamRimmer (talk) 11:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everest Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article After Operation London Cafe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Operation London Cafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 21:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. Thank you for your work on Songadya. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work! Many sources available at google books, please add them.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|DreamRimmer)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– DreamRimmer (talk) 01:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar,

Just a reminder that category redirects are created differently than article redirects. Please look at the code/template on this page so you'll know how to create a proper category redirect should you want to in the future. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kutub Inamdar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG. No Significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and hello@Jeraxmoira

I DPD the article. KI may meet WP:CREATIVE. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mushy Yank, we meet again in a deprod <3

It does not actually. I did a WP:Before and a source analysis; none of the films he has edited has anything more than a trivial mention of his name. I will consider AfDing it soon if it does not get improved over time. Cheers Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. Thank you for your work on Kutub Inamdar. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work, you may add information about his early life.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Dcotos)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Autograph Marathi film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar,

This article was brought to an AFD discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Operation London Cafe) and the closure decision was to draftify this article. This information was stated in the page history. And yet, you moved the article back to main space of the project. So, I have reverted your move and fully protected this article so you can not move it again. You will need the cooperation of an administrator to move it to main space when the movie is actually released. For fuller information, I encourage you to read the arguments presented in the AFD.

Should you try to recreate this article in main space with a slightly different title, I will tag it for deletion and consider a block for you. Please abide by Wikipedia AFD closures, policies and guidelines. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Geardona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ashi Hi Banwa Banwi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geardona (talk) 00:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Geardona

I was try to move the character analysis next to cast section.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

One source added since previous submission, but it just mentions the topic, does not provide in-depth coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inspector Mahesh Jadhav and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 10:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Morekar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:After Operation London Cafe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Box office collection of Salaar movie is wrong.For bollywood films, take reference from 'Bollywood Hungama'site.But South films you have to take reference from Manobala Vijayabalan. 2409:40F2:1038:C090:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 07:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2409:40F2:1038:C090:8000:0:0:0 Manobala Vijaybalan is unreliable discussed several times, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Archive 7#Manobala Vijayabalan and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Archive index. Morekar (talk) 09:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to ask how even pinkvilla and box office India is trusted by you. they don't even show the correct and accurate box office numbers for the south Indian films like Pushpa, Kantara, KGF 2.These are reliable articles below regarding the BO numbers of Salaar. Here are some references.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/box-office/salaar-box-office-collection-day-11-prabhas-starrer-globally-mints-rs-650-crore/articleshow/106464485.cms?from=mdr

https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/salaar-box-office-day-11-prabhas-film-marching-towards-rs-650-crore-globally-2483022-2024-01-02

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/telugu/salaar-box-office-collection-day-13-prabhas-starrer-third-biggest-telugu-grosser-after-baahubali-2-rrr-crosses-rs-650-crore-worldwide-9094458/

https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/telugu-cinema/salaar-worldwide-box-office-collection-day-13-prabhas-film-baahubali-2-rrr-south-blockbusters-650-crore-101704352612822.html

please see to this and update Salaar box office accordingly and dont take false box office collection on south indian movies because either you might hate south indian movies or only want to show bo figures of south indian in small lengths--Guru Deepak y (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sangte Aika you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sangte Aika for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TompaDompa -- TompaDompa (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaukat Raja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dharla Tar Chavtay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pune Ring road.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Morekar!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ultra Jhakaas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra Jhakaas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lordofhunter (talk) 04:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ultra Jhakaas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is Track Tollywood a reliable source? 103.42.197.148 (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghar Banduk Biryani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jalna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lochya Zaala Re film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ravindra Mahajani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV9 (India).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pickle entertainment.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Morekar, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jenma Films International, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenma Films International.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|North8000)). And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. Thank you for your work on Prabhakar More (actor). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|North8000)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kothare Vision.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Everest Entertainment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Marathi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette^Edit! 14:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jenma Films International.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morekar. Thank you for your work on Planet Marathi. Another editor, TechnoSquirrel69, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article! Many of the sources in this article appear to be press releases disguised as news coverage and need to be removed for the most part. It appears that real reliable sources exist on this subject and can be included instead. Let me know if you have any questions! (please  mention me on reply; thanks!)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|TechnoSquirrel69)). (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morekar. Thank you for your work on Delivery Boy (film). Another editor, Asparagusus, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Asparagusus)). (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 00:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morekar. Thank you for your work on Teen Adkun Sitaram. Another editor, SafariScribe, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This is beautiful. Kudos!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SafariScribe)). (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating clean articles. cheers !

Dcotos (talk) 08:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dharla Tar Chavtay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grabup (talk) 08:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Morekar/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male ghosts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morekar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Categories that are not likely to expand beyond more than a few members should be avoided. This is overcategorization. Not every existing article for a film should be further divided into a new category for every city and town it was filmed in. Parent categories suffice. Please avoid overcategorization. Οἶδα (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I too had doubt about reliability of this source. Do you know where the consensus on its reliability took place? RangersRus (talk) 12:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RangersRus This source is considered unreliable despite not being listed here as articles 1 and 2 cite varying budgets. Morekar (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Whistle Podu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 06:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Aatmapamphlet film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article Salaar: Part 1 – Ceasefire did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Salaar:_Part_1_%E2%80%93_Ceasefire/Archive_1#Just_for_your_information

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force/Archive_9#Is_Box_Office_India_reliable_for_South_Indian_movies

Box Office India is not reliable for South Indian movies, as their website confirms that they only track Hindi films.[3] Kindly check the archived discussions for more information. RWILD✉ 04:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Morekar also previously @RWILDONLINE has given also stated the same. Please stop reverting the changes made. PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Rohan Patil. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 05:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

update kalki box office for list of Telugu film of 2024 2409:40F3:1A:ED1B:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done

@Morekar there has been a discussion in Indian cinema task force regarding Salaar linking [4] under section ‘Is Box offie india reliable for south films.’

Please check this discussion and also lets discuss here before you revert my changes. PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are currently new to Wikipedia, and I have used all four independent sources without violating any Wikipedia policies.

I know I am new, but please look at the discussion attached and credibility of the sources used in the discussion. BOI is not a reliable source for south movies.

There has been a detailed discussion on taskpage and this and only then changes were made. PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 17:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we want to talk about that discussion, it was about the use of news websites. I have used box office tracking websites here. If you change figures, that will now be reverted back.

Bro see, for south films there is no exact tracking websites like those for bollywood. The discussion states that BOI is not a reliable source for south films. Thats why reliable news articles are considered for south movies.

I have added only the relaible news articles from the list of reliable sources link news18, the statesmen. But you have removed those and added the ones which reports least. Why so?

Also the makers of the movie have reported it as above 700. So there is no reason for you to reduce numbers. PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 18:02, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Morekar

Here is the lastest update from times of India. [5]

Salaar was released in Japan last week. So we need to take the recent news for that.

Salaar Japan collection also need to be included right?

These are the latest reports.

1. https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/telugu/prabhas-salaar-surpasses-shah-rukh-khans-pathaan-to-become-third-biggest-opening-for-an-indian-film-in-japan-9444749/

2. https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/prabhas-salaar-third-biggest-opener-japan-2564757-2024-07-10

3. https://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/amid-kalki-2898-ad-emerging-as-the-global-blockbuster-prabhas-salaar-releases-at-the-japan-box-office-13790106.html

These are the latest collection with Japan included. PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 18:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then what about The Times of India which reported in Feb 2024 around 615.26 crores and I have also used 123 telugu which also reported close numbers.

Why should we trust News18 instead of these box office tracking websites?

In this source 1 see the first line in second paragraph which states "According to a report by Pinkvilla, a source close to the production confirmed that the sequel..." is really independent.

You can go with the second (India today) and third one (Firstpost), the first one (the Indian express) is used Sacnilk data. I don't think you have presented these sources before.

Cool, can you please make the changes with latest japan updates in the pages PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 18:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Morekar

There are one more reliable one

https://zeenews.india.com/bollywood/salaar-part-1-ceasefire-set-to-make-waves-with-a-grand-release-in-japan-crosses-700-crores-in-box-office-collection-2763953.html

by zee news which is also a reliable one PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 18:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two sources are sufficient.

 Done Thanks for the information.

@Morekar can you make the changes to Highest grossing indian films page as well [6] PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 19:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro what's the notablity of song Aaha Hero? 103.154.37.41 (talk) 04:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by AirshipJungleman29 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit wasn't productive. There is a warning given to assess WP:ICTFSOURCES table before adding box office figures. Times of India is not reliable per ICTF and WP:TOI for box office figures. Experienced editors like you shouldn't ignore the hidden text warnings in such a persistent disruptive page which in protected to avoid the edits like the ones you made. Please be careful next time. Thanks and happy editing. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, after looking at your userpage, it's apparent that you are interested in movies and film related articles. Please be well versed with WP:ICTFSOURCES and WP:FRUIT and similar guidelines to edit better and more productively. Ping me for any doubts or assistance. Thanks :) — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:57, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald (Benison), Thanks for your guidance, This will definitely help me. Morekar (talk)

@Morekar Thank you for your edits in the Vishal Devrukhkar article. As you are an experienced editor in the Hindi and Marathi films category, I am working on draft:Vaibhav Palhade, which has been under review for a long time. I have addressed all the issues and comments mentioned by previous reviewers. Could you please help me with this draft to ensure it meets Wikipedia's standards? I would greatly appreciate your guidance and assistance in improving it further. Looking forward to your help. Thank you! (Ballal2003 (talk) 20:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC))[reply]

The redirect Y ( 2022 Marathi film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14 § Y ( 2022 Marathi film) until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Maharashtra Premier League indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]