This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Another editor has added the "((prod))" template to the article Greenwaldian Theorem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the ((prod)) template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I have made sure that I have not violated the 3RR rule because I have been suspended for this in the past. I have waited patiently for a day to pass before I could add the better, more famous image of Stalin (which was on the article before Kurzon came along). Unfortunately, Kurzon has taken a different tactic and in the past couple of hours he has reverted three times without an edit summary to two different editors. --Tocino 08:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Check out these latest series of edits by User:Kurzon on the Joseph Stalin article. Link here= [1] . He is completely re-writing paragraphs and removing some sourced information. Is there any way we can stop this without getting in edit wars? Remember, the article was a former featured article candidate. It doesn't need this overhaul. --Tocino 22:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)