This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Justiyaya, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place ((Help me)) on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Ashleyyoursmile! 06:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, please do not remove redirects like you did here and revert edits by other editors. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile! 11:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Tim McCormack was named Arizona State's women's lacrosse Head Coach beginning with the 2020 season. Here's his bio on the ASU Athletics website:https://thesundevils.com/sports/womens-lacrosse/roster/coaches/tim-mccormack/4486

Thanks, that was my mistake reverting your edit. I'll add the link you provided as an citation -Justiyaya (talk) 05:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Conversation was continued here User talk:Aseivert#May 2021

I fixed grammar and add some important naming links. I removed not a section, I removed such a hateful links. So you again revert it Thanks Shalivahan2 (talk) 10:13, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

I have restored the edit on that article. I would still argue that your edit summary [1] was insufficient to justify removal of citations, try reading this page Help:Edit summary. Justiyaya (talk) 13:21, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 15 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It needs multiple independent sources. While primary sources affiliated with the program can be used generally, they don't show notability. The National Education Policy Center source is not an independent source, because they created the program. The Washington Post is also not independent, because they seem to be somehow affiliated with the program, even though the fact that they announce the decision is not sourced by the inline citations provided? The Kappaonline/academic article is written by National Education Policy Center people. CU Boulder Today and Newsday are local sources providing routine coverage ("school receives an award"), rather than talking about the program in-depth. This is a probably a borderline case and adding a couple of sources might be sufficient for whoever reviews this next.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schools of Opportunity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Schools of Opportunity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

15 (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my article. I thought it was going to take a few months and compared to that this review was really fast. Sorry about submitting an unfinished article. I'll keep working on it. Justiyaya (talk) 13:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Justiyaya! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 15 (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)