The current version of the puzzle sphere was produced by User:Nohat. I believe that he's said that he doesn't have the original source files, though. Also, I should warn you that making an animated version would prove difficult in certain ways: there aren't characters defined for pieces that aren't visible, and the geometry of the globe is such that the pieces converge to a point at the poles (well, the bottom pole, anyways), which would probably not look very pretty. Both of these could be fixed, though, if the POV-Ray sources still existed. Paul Stansifer 01:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My source files are at meta:International logo contest/Final logo variants/Paullusmagnus, but I should warn you that what you want to do would be pretty hard with the source files -- the model is just a series of closely nested spheres with transparent areas to create the gaps. You could create a separate set of spheres with their own textures for the extra pieces, but you'd have to face the issue of the weirdly-shaped pieces near the poles, and it'd be hard to come up with a good solution for that. But good luck, if you decide to try it. Paul Stansifer 04:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The new navbox for Metalworking - Welding is: ((Metalworking navbox|weldopen)) The old template is being phased out and will be deleted. Bryancpark (talk) 04:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Roy! I noticed that a couple of redirects you created have been nominated for deletion over at WP:RFD#Waterless_Water and you had not been notified. You may wish to join the discussion there. -- Thinking of England (talk) 12:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You inserted the bit about The Daily Show in the Carlson article so I figured you might like to join the debate now:

Talk:Gretchen_Carlson#Jon_Stewart_comments_of_December_8.2C_2009

--Louiedog (talk) 02:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any examples of the usage of this symbol? I can't find any instances of ℔ and it would be nice to know what the context is. SpinningSpark 06:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, ok, it's got a unicode code, but we knew that already, otherwise you wouldn't have been able to put it in the text. The question is is it actually being used anywhere. If not it is pretty unnotable, or at least only of historic interest and should be marked as archaic. SpinningSpark 17:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!