Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Fysjsj2517! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 02:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll work hard on my edits. Fysjsj2517 (talk) 03:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fysjsj2517, I'm concerned with the abundant overlinking within the article, which will require a bit of cherry-picking to correct, and also with this characterization of your account [1]--can you clarify who is "we?" Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"we?". I didn't quite understand. We're sorry. Fysjsj2517 (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fysjsj2517! Your additions to Nikolayevsk incident have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for reviewing the edit, but your claim is not true.

There was no copyright violation in the sentence you removed.

We also checked for plagiarism using Grammarly, which is included in 'Category:Plagiarism detectors', cited from Wikipedia:Plagiarism.

We used the “Plagiarism Checker by Grammarly” to check for plagiarism. [[2]]

The plagiarism check results read “We didn't find any plagiarism, but we found 5 writing issues.”, “No plagiarism found”.

In other words, it's not plagiarized.

However, it only showed that there were issues with “Spelling” and “Conciseness”.

In other words, I did write my sentences awkwardly. But it's not plagiarism, according to the check.

Now that I've proven that I didn't plagiarize, can I restore the work you deleted? Fysjsj2517 (talk) 09:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since the “Plagiarism Checker by Grammarly” proved that I didn't plagiarize, I have a question for you. Why did you think I plagiarized? Fysjsj2517 (talk) 09:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk page. — Diannaa (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]