Hi DS - I'd invite you to help improve the article, instead of just commenting on what you think has motivated the editors who have been involved in changing the page. The reasoning behind most changes has been laid out in pretty extensive detail on the talk page and more input is certainly always welcome to make a better article, especially any help finding high quality reliable sources that can be used to improve the article. (You should also be advised that Men's rights is currently under article probation, the terms of which can be viewed here: Talk:Men's_rights/Article_probation.) Kevin (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you, Wikipedia is turning into crap, I don't want to be part of that. DS Belgium (talk) 21:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WT:MEDA cares. Certain article ratings have an unfortunate tendency to be "adjusted" by people who are hoping to attract more attention to their favorite subject. I scan through the Top- and High- lists every couple of months, and I know I'm not the only one who does so, but it's really, really easy to miss problems.

Also, most of the task forces aren't focused on tagging articles. Anyone can do that. Just add |psychiatry=yes to the WPMED template at any article you believe is relevant. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've packed my bags, and I'm out of here. Good luck DS Belgium (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]