Czarking0 (talk) 04:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Czarking0! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Nardog (talk) 16:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czarking0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

three of the sources don't mention Pinnacol and the others appear to be primary source documents. Wikipedia summarises what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sending you a round of applause which you so richly deserve for all your efforts on Christianization of the Roman Empire as diffusion of innovation. I will never forget your great kindness and your tremendous skill. Thank you. Jenhawk777 (talk) 22:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dearheart, if you feel it is time, would you do the honors and close out the review? Jenhawk777 (talk) 03:13, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Than you for the high commendation! This is actually my first article review, and I really enjoyed it. I'd be happy to review more of your work in the feature as you were awesome to work with. I have a couple other things on my docket that are perhaps less in your wheelhouse. Do you by chance know any dutch speakers who would want to review Hugo Krabbe? Czarking0 (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czarking0. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pinnacol Assurance Fund, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Czarking0. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pinnacol Assurance Fund".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Clearview AI, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. StereoFolic (talk) 21:06, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Czarking0, thank you so much for your GA review on the VanossGaming biography, I agreed with all your comments. I've made a load of changes and I've done my best to address your comments, I've made notes as to how I addressed each one on the talk page. I was wondering if I should renominate the article for GA status, that way we could have another go together at perfecting the biography? Also I was reading your talk page about your degree, I'm currently doing a BSc in math and physics, it is certainly loads of fun ahah. Thanks again for the article review, looking forward to your next suggestion :) Idiosincrático (talk) 08:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated the article for GA again, would appreciate your review. :) Idiosincrático (talk) 02:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Idiosincrático I have been busy with work. Thanks for your contribution in editting the article. Good luck with your studies. I will relook at the GA when I have some time Czarking0 (talk) 17:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nick-D -- Nick-D (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the March 2024 backlog drive. Your contribution (3 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 203.7.123.1 -- 203.7.123.1 (talk) 12:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clearview AI you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Clearview AI you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clearview AI for comments about the article, and Talk:Clearview AI/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 09:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Congratulations! You did a great job. I liked the discussion about confidence intervals and accuracy. Y'all made a good compromise about how to convey that. Also, I missed the part about NIST (or maybe I glossed over it, I don't recall since it was back in September 2023). I made some edits tonight, nothing major. They were mostly things that Mike had mentioned. I did leave a comment in a transcluded place that I want to bring to your attention. Please see here. My comments are at the very end of that section. You and Mike don't need to reply unless you want to.--FeralOink (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk and Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk/GA3 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk for comments about the article, and Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Czarking0,

I saw you declined the article here mostly as a copyvio of [1]. Welp, you are extremely correct but I doubt that the Wiki article was copied, rather, the LP website copied Wikipedia. That could have been should we using the Wayback Machine. However, I saw the article isn't potentially written especially with the recent IP edits, so I have transcluded a long time User:SafariScribe/Peter Obi, which you can check, and I am sure I will finish it before the end of July. After that I will notify you of the nomination. It's good what you did, because if I were you, I will do same. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Czarking0, after reading, rewriting, and restructuring, I have renominated the article Peter Obi again for GAR. You may now consider reviewing when you feel you can. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly and thank you. I plan to approach it after Malin Massacre is done Czarking0 (talk) 00:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Press release from Business Wire and from Yahoo finance doesn't show notability. Also, Capacity magazine is unreliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Streaming Video Alliance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Data Center Interconnect, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 15:47, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]