hi, feel free to post a message below:

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Scientific racism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Smashville^BONK! 00:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I feel the wording you are suggesting is entirely too biased and reeks of fanboyism. Amos is THE pioneer? This is an encyclopedia, not a fansite. If you still take issue with my opinion, please take it up on the talk page. Many thanks, and welcome to the community. Samuel Grant (talk) 23:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your arguement that Amos is "the pioneer for women using the piano", and your claim that using this is right because "it is true", then you should be able to find a reference which says it. If not, it will be removed once more, because "it is true" is not good enough for presenting an opinion on Wikipedia. The359 (talk) 19:19, 14 May 2008 (UT

It is possible Tori Amos is A pioneer in some ways. "a pioneer" isn't really that much more fanboyish than Tori Amos being at the "forefront". Wikipedia's reference requirements favor the status quo too much and have serious issues, Wikipedia should switch to a sources section at the bottom and remove the reference clutter mess from every article. Convergence Dude (talk) 23:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]