User talk:Coldstone Steve Boston
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Coldstone Steve Boston (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I just logged into my account and saw that I have been blocked for supposedly being a sock puppet.
I have had no other accounts on Wikipedia. I see that three points were raised to supposedly prove that I am a sock puppet. First the name is indeed based on Stone Cold Steve Austin but just because I thought it was a goofy name for an account. There is nothing deeper to that or a connection to Hulk Hogan. Second, the edit I made to the eye color page was in line with the other edits I had made to various other pages, most small edits. I actually enjoy reading talk pages and previous edit logs when trying to find something on a page to edit. I noticed a previous user had made the point that a point had been repeated, so I made the same edit because I thought it was a good edit. I did not know there was any controversy surrounding the user in question. Finally to the third point, the idea of an obsession with Schleswig holstein and how it supposedly connects to Aryans. I have neverade any edits in regards to "Aryans", and the point I made in regard to Schleswig Holstein was not even my own idea, it came from the talk page on Germanic peoples, in which the users of that page agreed that the Germanic culture came further south than Schleswig Holstein, so I attempted to make page edits based on what they stated. This had zero mention of an Aryan race, and it was not even my own idea or obsession. Additionally, being from a Scandinavian country, I find the subjects of the Germanic people and blue eyes interesting, neither of these are that uncommon of interests for a specific demographic of young men.
I ask kindly that this block be reviewed. I am not sure how I can disprove that I am the user I am being accused of because I cannot disprove a negative. I feel that my edit history will show no obsession with any single topic and all of my edits have been made in good faith. Thank you. Coldstone Steve Boston (talk) 19:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
((Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Not a sock puppet Hello, I just logged into my account and saw that I have been blocked for supposedly being a sock puppet. I have had no other accounts on Wikipedia. I see that three points were raised to supposedly prove that I am a sock puppet. First the name is indeed based on Stone Cold Steve Austin but just because I thought it was a goofy name for an account. There is nothing deeper to that or a connection to Hulk Hogan. Second, the edit I made to the eye color page was in line with the other edits I had made to various other pages, most small edits. I actually enjoy reading talk pages and previous edit logs when trying to find something on a page to edit. I noticed a previous user had made the point that a point had been repeated, so I made the same edit because I thought it was a good edit. I did not know there was any controversy surrounding the user in question. Finally to the third point, the idea of an obsession with Schleswig holstein and how it supposedly connects to Aryans. I have neverade any edits in regards to "Aryans", and the point I made in regard to Schleswig Holstein was not even my own idea, it came from the talk page on Germanic peoples, in which the users of that page agreed that the Germanic culture came further south than Schleswig Holstein, so I attempted to make page edits based on what they stated. This had zero mention of an Aryan race, and it was not even my own idea or obsession. Additionally, being from a Scandinavian country, I find the subjects of the Germanic people and blue eyes interesting, neither of these are that uncommon of interests for a specific demographic of young men. I ask kindly that this block be reviewed. I am not sure how I can disprove that I am the user I am being accused of because I cannot disprove a negative. I feel that my edit history will show no obsession with any single topic and all of my edits have been made in good faith. Thank you. [[User:Coldstone Steve Boston|Coldstone Steve Boston]] ([[User talk:Coldstone Steve Boston#top|talk]]) 19:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~))
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting ((subst:Decline reason here))
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
((unblock reviewed |1=Not a sock puppet Hello, I just logged into my account and saw that I have been blocked for supposedly being a sock puppet. I have had no other accounts on Wikipedia. I see that three points were raised to supposedly prove that I am a sock puppet. First the name is indeed based on Stone Cold Steve Austin but just because I thought it was a goofy name for an account. There is nothing deeper to that or a connection to Hulk Hogan. Second, the edit I made to the eye color page was in line with the other edits I had made to various other pages, most small edits. I actually enjoy reading talk pages and previous edit logs when trying to find something on a page to edit. I noticed a previous user had made the point that a point had been repeated, so I made the same edit because I thought it was a good edit. I did not know there was any controversy surrounding the user in question. Finally to the third point, the idea of an obsession with Schleswig holstein and how it supposedly connects to Aryans. I have neverade any edits in regards to "Aryans", and the point I made in regard to Schleswig Holstein was not even my own idea, it came from the talk page on Germanic peoples, in which the users of that page agreed that the Germanic culture came further south than Schleswig Holstein, so I attempted to make page edits based on what they stated. This had zero mention of an Aryan race, and it was not even my own idea or obsession. Additionally, being from a Scandinavian country, I find the subjects of the Germanic people and blue eyes interesting, neither of these are that uncommon of interests for a specific demographic of young men. I ask kindly that this block be reviewed. I am not sure how I can disprove that I am the user I am being accused of because I cannot disprove a negative. I feel that my edit history will show no obsession with any single topic and all of my edits have been made in good faith. Thank you. [[User:Coldstone Steve Boston|Coldstone Steve Boston]] ([[User talk:Coldstone Steve Boston#top|talk]]) 19:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |decline = ((subst:Decline reason here)) ~~~~))
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
((unblock reviewed |1=Not a sock puppet Hello, I just logged into my account and saw that I have been blocked for supposedly being a sock puppet. I have had no other accounts on Wikipedia. I see that three points were raised to supposedly prove that I am a sock puppet. First the name is indeed based on Stone Cold Steve Austin but just because I thought it was a goofy name for an account. There is nothing deeper to that or a connection to Hulk Hogan. Second, the edit I made to the eye color page was in line with the other edits I had made to various other pages, most small edits. I actually enjoy reading talk pages and previous edit logs when trying to find something on a page to edit. I noticed a previous user had made the point that a point had been repeated, so I made the same edit because I thought it was a good edit. I did not know there was any controversy surrounding the user in question. Finally to the third point, the idea of an obsession with Schleswig holstein and how it supposedly connects to Aryans. I have neverade any edits in regards to "Aryans", and the point I made in regard to Schleswig Holstein was not even my own idea, it came from the talk page on Germanic peoples, in which the users of that page agreed that the Germanic culture came further south than Schleswig Holstein, so I attempted to make page edits based on what they stated. This had zero mention of an Aryan race, and it was not even my own idea or obsession. Additionally, being from a Scandinavian country, I find the subjects of the Germanic people and blue eyes interesting, neither of these are that uncommon of interests for a specific demographic of young men. I ask kindly that this block be reviewed. I am not sure how I can disprove that I am the user I am being accused of because I cannot disprove a negative. I feel that my edit history will show no obsession with any single topic and all of my edits have been made in good faith. Thank you. [[User:Coldstone Steve Boston|Coldstone Steve Boston]] ([[User talk:Coldstone Steve Boston#top|talk]]) 19:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~))
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.