For faster navigation, this Iframe is preloading the Wikiwand page for User talk:Anonx1995.

User talk:Anonx1995

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Evolutionary history of life, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 00:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Evolutionary history of life. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 00:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, would you advocate your thoughts ? Fatapatate (talk) 19:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you have no arguments whatsoever, please stay out of scientific wikipedia pages... Fatapatate (talk) 10:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Human, you will be blocked from editing. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 22:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

Try editing Conservapedia. Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (talk) 22:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just going to tell you once. Stay away from Marcus Aurelius Antonius and contribute to the encyclopedia, or else you'll be blocked without warning. Blueboy96 22:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[BellaKazza]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not for proseletizing. The Truth as you know it is just the truth as you know it--only viable in its own self-contained sphere. Wikipedia is not that sphere--we are based on verifiability, which "because God made it that way" fails badly. As you get older and become exposed to other points of view and other Truths besides the single one you have been taught, you will learn to tolerate others rather than insult them, since that is how you would wish to be treated. DMacks (talk) 02:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC) [BellaKazza] [BellaKazza][reply]

{{bottomLinkPreText}} {{bottomLinkText}}
User talk:Anonx1995
Listen to this article

This browser is not supported by Wikiwand :(
Wikiwand requires a browser with modern capabilities in order to provide you with the best reading experience.
Please download and use one of the following browsers:

This article was just edited, click to reload
This article has been deleted on Wikipedia (Why?)

Back to homepage

Please click Add in the dialog above
Please click Allow in the top-left corner,
then click Install Now in the dialog
Please click Open in the download dialog,
then click Install
Please click the "Downloads" icon in the Safari toolbar, open the first download in the list,
then click Install
{{::$root.activation.text}}

Install Wikiwand

Install on Chrome Install on Firefox
Don't forget to rate us

Tell your friends about Wikiwand!

Gmail Facebook Twitter Link

Enjoying Wikiwand?

Tell your friends and spread the love:
Share on Gmail Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Buffer

Our magic isn't perfect

You can help our automatic cover photo selection by reporting an unsuitable photo.

This photo is visually disturbing This photo is not a good choice

Thank you for helping!


Your input will affect cover photo selection, along with input from other users.

X

Get ready for Wikiwand 2.0 ๐ŸŽ‰! the new version arrives on September 1st! Don't want to wait?