I was looking at the overall cricket coverage and wondered why John Bradman should be in the main subject category, as well as in the South Australia category. I've commented my retirement notice out for the present as I'll be doing research and I may complete some more amendments or corrections. We shall see. BajanBrent (talk) 14:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried the site five year back, before Covid. I wasn't keen and let it drop. During Covid, I thought it would be a good lockdown activity but I couldn't remember my password so I let it drop again. The other day, I was looking thru old diaries and in one I found a list of internet passwords. So, I've logged in again but I don't know what I will do here because the standard of most articles is poor and I don't want to spend time cleaning up one mess after another. Glad to see no one has deleted Clifford Inniss, my one piece of wikiwork. BajanBrent (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Clifford Inniss. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks. BajanBrent (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note. The article was later promoted from its draft version to Clifford Inniss. BajanBrent (talk) 16:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)). Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]