Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hi, thanks for taking a look at the mess that is currently the articles related to Doping in China and cleaning them up. Could you also check concerns and controversies at the 2024 Summer Olympics where the same group of editors are pushing an increasingly pro-China version of events? Their latest edit. Pizzigs (talk) 08:09, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Amigao:, they continue to push their preferred versions but I don't want to get involved for a while because the previous entanglement with these editors got me blocked for 48h for edit warring. The other editor was also blocked, but still it'd be better for a more experienced editor to take a look. Thank you. Pizzigs (talk) 07:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Can I know the reason for your this removal, that you have not mentioned in the edit summary? ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 19:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide a diff? Thanks. - Amigao (talk) 22:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please desist from reverting edits and edit-warring, especially on the anti-Chinese sentiment page, by removing important neutral and highly relevant information that has been stated concisely and which is amply supported by academic citations. MingScribe1368 (talk) 16:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might consider reviewing WP:ONUS and also WP:AGF first. Amigao (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MingScribe1368 (talk) 04:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Daniel Case (talk) 01:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for your diligent and commendable efforts to defend Wikipedia from malicious actors! Normchou 💬 01:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Sima Nan, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please don't stealth revert changes like you did with [1]. This page was purged as part of a CFD that @HouseBlaster: just closed. Mason (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]