New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 19:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC) 192.76.8.84 (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, 192.76.8.84, is registered to University of Oxford and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using ((School block)). In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Queen Elizabeth's School, Barnet— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 17:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at High Pay Centre, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Raima Sen, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Solipsism 101. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Helen Glover (rower) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Solipsism 101 (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ToastGuard. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Toast (talk) 13:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Frank Dellaert, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:06, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MaterialWorks. I noticed that in this edit to The Queen's College Boat Club, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MaterialWorks _(talk) 16:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Deepfriedokra's talk page. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 01:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, as you said, we don't need an explicit policy that you can't misrepresent sources, but I did get curious if there is one. All three core content policies have language that alludes to that idea, but none say it outright. WP:HOAX sorta says it but also not quite. Finally did find it—WP:DISRUPTSIGNS #2. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:16, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamzin I think this would fall under WP:V - All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material — in this case the sources provided do not "directly support the material" because the edit is misrepresenting what the sources said.

It's an essay rather than a policy, but WP:CHERRYPICKING is the page that immediately sprung to mind for me when I read the block rationale on your talk page. 192.76.8.84 (talk) 19:46, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]