This user values third opinions and occasionally provides one.

Fighting for accuracy, reasonable completeness, objectivity, and decency for ..... well, for a while now.

Sorry about your Duke, but those are HIS words not mine. That article whitewashes who he was and I actually toned it tone. the playboy interview is very well known and needs to be fleshed out.Catherine Huebscher (talk) 9:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

I have to aknowledge that I am not an expert on Eugene O'Neill. I contributed some stuff to the article on Long Day's Journey Into Night (which regrettably I have still not completed but will get to it) I don't know his comedies. The question is why the section was deleted. If you don't agree with this decision, try to find an external reference that supports your point of view (even a publisher's note from a dust cover will do) and then rewrite the article with the reference. References are intended for just this purpose - verifiability. Mike Hayes/ mike hayes (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation to participate in the discussion on this article - much appreciated! Dunks (talk) 03:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)