PLEASE NOTE: There's already been a discussion about my username. It was decided it wasn't offensive and wasn't being used to defame any organization, so was kept by decision of the community. So if you're here to discuss that, please don't.

User	Talk	Contributions	eMail

Userboxes (edit) This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify) This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify) DGAF This user does not give a fuck. This user is part of the adoption program, but is taking a break from adopting any new users. This user is a member of the Welcoming Committee. User:Alexjohnc3/Userboxes/user age js-N This user is fluent in JavaScript. PHP This user is an expert PHP Coder. py-2 This user is an intermediate Python programmer. ə This user is a Grammar Nazi. UK This user uses British English. cAPS CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

HistoryStudent113 has eaten your ((cookie))! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more ((cookie))s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding ((subst:cookie)) to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with ((subst:munch))!

Hello, I see you have listed yourself as a participant at Wikiproject Computing Assessment, as being interested in evaluating computing-related articles. There is a discussion right now at Talk:Apple media events about the article Apple media events. The questions are: 1) Does the article Apple media events fall under Wikiproject Computing; and if so, 2) What Importance (Top, High, Mid, Low) should it be assigned? Your participation is appreciated! Thanks... Zad68 (talk) 18:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bump ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.45.37.7 (talk) 01:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]