Template talk:Warren Ellis
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Picture?
[edit]Do we really need it? It shoves everything over creating a large column of whitespace which could be better used in making the height of the template smaller. (Emperor (talk) 00:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC))
- I take your point but the unillustrated version with its redlinks and black dots everywhere is not easy on eye. I'm not pushed either way Skomorokh 00:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see adding the picture helps though. The template does need work - it could do with the colouring put back in which certainly makes it easier to read and takes the eye off the redlinks [1], that said I'd not object to removing the redlinks (as is done with a number on there now) - they should be linked in from his bibliography and if anyone feels strongly about it then they can start the entry and link it in ;) (Emperor (talk) 00:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC))
- Haha, anyone in mind? I removed the redlinks and the image as a compromise. Skomorokh 00:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see adding the picture helps though. The template does need work - it could do with the colouring put back in which certainly makes it easier to read and takes the eye off the redlinks [1], that said I'd not object to removing the redlinks (as is done with a number on there now) - they should be linked in from his bibliography and if anyone feels strongly about it then they can start the entry and link it in ;) (Emperor (talk) 00:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC))
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
Cover photo is available under {{::mainImage.info.license.name || 'Unknown'}} license.
Cover photo is available under {{::mainImage.info.license.name || 'Unknown'}} license.
Credit:
(see original file).
