This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ice Hockey This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles New York City This template is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles

This is so far from encyclopedic it's kinda impressive! MATTUE MATEUE! !!!1! LOL --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 02:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is nowhere near close to encyclopedic, and I'm afraid I'm going to have to take a hatchet to it. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 02:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should we keep the following in the template, as they are part of Rangers' culture and lore: George Kalinsky, Knicks-Rangers Finals Series of 1994, Matteau!! Matteau!! Matteau!! All three of them were deleted? -- SNIyer12, (talk), 15:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The point of the template is not to highlight every single catch phrase, piece of trivia or minor historical note, but to capture major topics. I axed a bunch because they were duplicate links - the Knicks-Rangers "final" is not notable, and MSG is already linked. "Matteau!! Matteau!! Matteau!!" is meaningless to anyone not intimately familiar with it's context, and is undoubtedly already mentioned in other linked articles - namely History and the 1993-94 Rangers season/1994 Stanley Cup Playoffs articles. If Rose is that notable, then link him as Howie Rose, easter eggs are generally considered bad. I have no idea if Kalinsky is so notable as to belong in the template, but if so, then I'd say re-add him as well. Resolute 16:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]