This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Professional wrestling Money in the Bank winners is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles Biography: Sports and Games This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This template is supported by the sports and games work group.

I'm proposing that this template be reorganized to remove the distinction of winners by world titles, because it is not a valid distinction. Or at least hasn't been since WWE eliminated the separate MITB matches for the separate brands. Since that time the annual winner can challenge for either world title, with no limitation on challenging for their current brand's world title. Plus the poor current organization makes it look like a given year's match had only competitions from that brand, which is plainly incorrect. It should just be a straight chronological list of men's winners and another of women's winners. For the four years (out of 19 now) where there were two winners, list them both with the brand noted. So it would say, for example: Alberto Del Rio (2011, Raw) • Daniel Bryan (2011, SmackDown). Especially since the titles have switched brands during both brand splits, so telling the title doesn't illustrate anything. Frankly, to be extra blunt, the current organization is shit.

(Frankly, I think we make too much of the brands, as it's a purely in-universe distinction and in reality it's all WWE, with zero distinction in wrestlers' contracts and them assigned or moved to whichever brand creative deems them needed in at a given moment. But I digress.) oknazevad (talk) 22:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]