This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical music This template is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this template or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles Opera This template falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles Composers This template is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles

Why is the Brahms-Schoenberg work listed as though the ballet is Schoenberg's work? It isn't; only the arrangement is. I know you have deleted the arrangements - I think that's a mistake. This work should be included among them but as the arrangement, not the ballet. -- kosboot (talk) 12:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a separate section for the arrangements is a good idea. Wish it had occurred to me as I was just re-ordering the sections almost-instinct 12:51, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't quite understand why this has been removed - the page that links to covers the 1897 quartet as well as the four with opus numbers? almost-instinct 12:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I assume when you refer to a D Major quartet being removed you mean you don't understand why the year "1987" was removed. Hyacinth (talk) 04:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]