This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the ((portal|Companies)) template Tag company talk pages with the ((WikiProject Companies)) project banner Answer requests for comments Websites: Computing This template is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles This template is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This template uses a very striking and 'ugly' color combination. Black with orange accents is a aposematic color combination usually present in venomous and poisonous animals. I suggest changing it to something more "mild". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.160.209.232 (talk) 19:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It defeats the purpose of putting this template on pages if it's displayed as hidden by default, as it is on amazon.com. I was looking on that page for information in this template, and I couldn't find it, so I added it. Only later did I stumble across this and open it and find what I had been looking for. I don't know how to change this so it always displays, given the complexity of the markup. Could someone who does please do so? -- Beland 17:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This has since been done. Thanks! -- Beland (talk) 01:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Amazon Light listed under "web sites"? It's not owned by Amazon.com; it just uses the Amazon APIs, like many other sites do. 67.168.62.119 04:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you asked this question 7 years ago, this item is listed under "Other". While the article has notability, I assume it is part of Amazon's box because it was made by an Amazon programmer while he worked there. Frmorrison (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now that the site has been discontinued, I think it should be removed. Daylen (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of Amazon's 13 senior vice presidents, why are only Rick Dalzell and Brian Valentine included in this template? Stephen Hui 14:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Hui, those are the only two senior vice presidents with Wikipedia pages. Daylen (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should Amazon Prime Pantry be added to the template? Daylen (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is already added but seems to me it is not on the right place/row/line — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tech201805 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

add

• Amazon Aurora

after

• AMI

Final result:

• AMI
• Amazon Aurora Tech201805 (talk) 11:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done L293D (☎ • ✎) 11:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon Route 53 service can be added after RDS on web service line/row — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tech201805 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Amazon CloudSearch
• Amazon CloudWatch
• Amazon Direct Connect
• Amazon ElastiCache
• Amazon Redshift
• Amazon Snowball

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tech201805 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This template has a horrible colour scheme. Just see what effect striking yellow with black has. It should be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16AdityaG09 (talk • contribs) 07:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC) Just improved colour scheme. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 16AdityaG09 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: Would it make sense to edit the criticisms together for example:

Criticism (tax) (Worker organization)

~ Shushugah (talk) 21:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it was a subpage, definitely but I don't think worker organization is necessarily a criticism of Amazon (or a direct subpage). The criticism article also has major scope issues (it should be broken up) so I wouldn't use it as a barometer. (not watching, please ((ping))) czar 21:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now that Amazon Freevee exists as is, where does it belong? It’s no longer IMDb branded after all, so does it more belong with Prime Video’s section now?--CreecregofLife (talk) 18:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]