Taylor v. Riojas
| Taylor v. Riojas | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided November 2, 2020 | |
| Full case name | Trent Michael Taylor v. Robert Riojas, et al. |
| Docket no. | 19-1261 |
| Citations | 592 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Per curiam | |
| Concurrence | Alito |
| Dissent | Thomas |
| Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Taylor v. Riojas, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with qualified immunity. It was the first case in which the Supreme Court relied on the obviousness of a constitutional violation to overturn a lower court's decision to grant qualified immunity.[1]
Trent Taylor was an inmate in a Texas prison. He filed a pro se lawsuit[2] alleging that he was confined for six days "in a pair of shockingly unsanitary cells." The District Court found no constitutional violation and granted summary judgment.[3] The Fifth Circuit found that Taylor's rights were violated, but concluded that summary judgment was still appropriate because the defendants "weren’t on 'fair warning' that their specific acts were unconstitutional."[4] The Supreme Court summarily reversed in a per curiam decision. Justice Alito concurred in the judgment, because he agreed with the Court's decision on the merits, but disagreed with the Court's decision to review the case in the first place.[5] Justice Thomas dissented without providing a written opinion.
References
[edit]- ^ Qualified Immunity—Obviousness Standard—Taylor v. Riojas, 135 Harv. L. Rev. 421, 428-30 (2021).
- ^ Hon. Carlton Reeves, How in the World Could They Reach That Conclusion?, 126 Dick. L. Rev. 827, 829 (2022).
- ^ Qualified Immunity—Obviousness Standard—Taylor v. Riojas, 135 Harv. L. Rev. 421, 422 (2021).
- ^ Zamir Ben-Dan, Taylor v. Riojas: Anatomy of a Supreme Court Intervention that Should Not Have Been Necessary, 5 Nev. L.J. Forum 23, 28 (2021).
- ^ "America's Trumpiest court doesn't care if your right to a fair trial was violated". vox.com. December 20, 2022.
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
