This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Palaeontology: Lobe-Fins Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Lobe-Fins task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Fishes Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I corrected the formatting, plus added template notes and these references: Scientists, led by Per Ahlberg found in Latvia the 365 million-year-old fossil skull, shoulders and part of the pelvis of the Ventastega curonica, which is more tetrapod than fish and looked similar to a small alligator. The discovery contributes to the evolutionary transition from fish to tetrapods (animals with 4 limbs and include such descendants as amphibians, birds and mammals).yahoo.com, Fossil of most primitive 4-legged creature foundnews.bbc.co.uk, Fossil fills out water-land leap--Florentino floro (talk) 09:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello i'm brisio

Please sorry if i sound disrespectful, but the page seems contradictin itself: it says "Ventastega was a tiktaalik-like tetrapodomorph" and then "Ventastega is one of the earliest Devonian tetrapods yet discovered" Ok, i know all tetrapod r tetrapodomorphs by descendence, but the page seems say ventastega is a non-tetrapod tetrapodomorph, a fish still To me it would be better sayin simply "it's a basal tetrapod" or so I found this 2009 paper sayin ventastega is a tetrapod and showin it's really 4-legged and MORE derived than elginerpeton, dat is a tetrapod Look at page two: there is a cladogram http://www.springerlink.com/content/v16470436056263j/fulltext.pdf

If someone wants, i can modify the page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brisio (talk • contribs) 05:52, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the issue is there are several definitions of "Tetrapod" currently in use, some more inclusive and supplanting Tetrapodomorph in usage. This issue won't be resolved anytime soon, at least until PhyloCode. If the scientists are contradicting each other, than that's the state of the science and might as well be reflected here ;) Dinoguy2 (talk) 21:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]