Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 15:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 18:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, no rush. Thanks! ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 19:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ɱ: Managed to add all my comments, returning only for reviews! This article is so well-written, I have only a few comments: Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• In History:

• sixteen students "sixteen" would look better in digits as per the MOS.

I like to keep history sections with more prose and less numbers if I can; and MOS:NUMERAL is okay with either. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, your choice. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 16:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "name was changed" is repeated at the end of the first para, how about "renamed"?

Done. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Also in 2015 Can be better worded as "The same year"

Done. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The college is opening a campus Better add "As of 2016".

Done. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• purchased the northern portion of the property When?

This sentence is just more information about the same purchase, in 2015. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• In Campus media:mise en place Does it not begin with caps?

That's correct, it's stylized in that fashion. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• In The CIA Singapore: Temasek Polytechnic is a duplink

It's often seen as okay in certain circumstances. Here I link it in the history section, however many people just reading about the campuses (or not reading history/any large paragraphs) will surely miss that earlier link and presume there's no page on Temasek, if it lacks a link in that campus section, pretty far down the page too I might add. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Duplinks are good in some cases... Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 16:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Parts of Campus media, Campuses, Brandig and Augie award need citations. Even if they do not need sources.

Looking into this... ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added some sources already, but I have more to go... ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 17:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ɱ: I think you are busy elsewhere, when can we finish working on the last point? Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 13:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I did a bit more recently; I will get to it again tomorrow. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 01:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No hurry, just let me know when you are done. The review is open till we keep working. :) Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 04:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added a lot more references, what do you think now? ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 17:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Much better! Only three parts look unsourced:

• The CIA Singapore section
• In popular media section
• Not all points on the alumni look sourced.

These fixed, I would be glad to promote this. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 17:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it should be fixed now. By the way, I'm curious if you'll be willing to review my FAC Briarcliff Manor Public Library, perhaps in turn for me reviewing your FAC Springbok? I likely need more eyes on the library article in order for it to pass. ɱ (talk · vbm · coi) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I am happy to promote this article. Thanks for your kind offer, I am willing to review any nomination I have some idea about. Will take some time out for it. Try springbok of you get time, no quid pro quo necessary. Cheers, Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 03:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]