This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religious texts (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Some time ago I added a link to SuttaCentral. I am the developer of that site, so this contravene's wikipedia's guidelines, which I didn't know at the time. Nevertheless, this link should be there. It is an actual link to the full text and translation of the text. Currently there is only a link to Access to Insight, which does not in fact have the texts in question. It inaccurately claims to point to "selected texts" when in fact the page it links to has links to the Patimokkha—a separate text—and various modern studies. The AtI link should be renamed, and the SC link restored. This also applies to multiple other links to SC which I have added, correcting false links, removing broken links, and generally keeping the relevant pages updated. This was wrongly described as spam and self-promotion, when in fact it is critical site maintenance. I would appreciate someone's help in restoring these edits. Sujato (talk) 01:11, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]