This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Networking / Software / Security / Free and open-source software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance). Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with: edit history watch purge Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information... Review importance and quality of existing articles Identify categories related to Computer Security Tag related articles Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests) Identify articles for improvement Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc. Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Do encyclopedia entries for software projects make sense? matt 17:25 Feb 24, 2003 (UTC)

If they are important software projects, yes. The Anome 17:30 Feb 24, 2003 (UTC)

Yeah, that's what I think. Linux yes. Stunnel no. matt 03:59 Feb 25, 2003 (UTC)

Why not? It is not like we are concerned with limited space and have to pick and choose between the two. We can have both. Each software project should be given the attention it deserves. If stunnel is not important, not a lot needs to be said about it. Does the article add to human knowledge? yes. Does it somehow minimize articles on other software projects? no.

Webmin is usin it. 84.137.193.250 18:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it more correct to say "most Unix-like operating systems" rather than "most Unix operating systems"? After reviewing the page on unix-like operating systems, I decided it was, and made the change... lenehey

From the given example:

"Network traffic from clients connecting to the mail server on port 465 would initially pass over SSL to the Stunnel application, which would then transparently forward unsecured traffic to port 25 of the mail server."

So stunnel is good for faking security when there actually is none? Weird example. --Abdull (talk) 23:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The example is valid. Stunnel is being used to add a security layer to a mail server, not a client, and thus enables encrypted traffic over the open Internet.--Chrisj1948 (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The first application protocol I ever implemented was SMTP so I really appreciated the example. However, think that perhaps an HTTP port-80 vs. port-443 tunnel might be more understandable or relateable to most people?

SystemBuilder (talk) 04:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]