This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Palaeontology: Lobe-Fins Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Lobe-Fins task force (assessed as Low-importance). Fishes Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmoretti21.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Clack ("Gaining Ground", 2002) does not support the use of the term "Rhipidistia" or "Crossopterygia". Biologistchica (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but people still run across these terms, and so need to know what they mean or meant. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Lion"? Is that correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.11.74 (talk) 07:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks Rhipidistia may now have a new official name that's already gaining acceptance.

bgee

ncbi

Zyxwv99 (talk) 19:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, I've just had a closer look. Dipnotetrapodomorpha looks like a novel junior synonym for Rhipidistia. Zyxwv99 (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice for someone to clarify what the "†" footnotes mean here! (Especially if the "?" is what means 'uncertain classification') --RProgrammer (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see it used in other articles now; does it mean "extinct"? --RProgrammer (talk) 17:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I’m no expert on fish taxonomy, by I think the lizard, toad, hummingbird and squirrel in the info box picture may be misplaced. —TroyHurts (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an error in the image. MakeItSo84 (talk) 22:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]