This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Like opportunism this article makes the same mistake in thinking that it is only to do with politics. --Penbat (talk) 21:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Let's add a section about Mass Media's role in political obstructionism.--Johnnybgoode409 (talk) 22:20, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The sentence "The Republican Senator from Kentucky is not known for any significant legislative achievement" is kind of dubious imo. Like a couple big things certainly passed under him, it's not some easily quantifiable thing at all, and there's only one source for this pretty significant claim. DemonDays64 (talk) 17:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]