This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the McMansion article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days

McMansion received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Linguistics: Etymology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Etymology Task Force. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On August 20, 2010, McMansion was linked from CNBC, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

I the picture with one I took two summers ago of a museum exhibit that dealt with McMansions. I haven't done much other than shrink it down, so perhaps the photo could use some cleaning up. Still, it seems a better than the random picture of a McMansion, seeing as we already have such a picture elsewhere in the article. --Our Bold Hero 9 July 2005 07:04 (UTC)

Great addition. Stbalbach 9 July 2005 17:01 (UTC)

I'm not sure why some suburban hell pictures were given as McMansions in Leesburg, VA. Not defending the town or those homes, but those aren't McMansions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.36.25.143 (talk) 07:05, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's this one neighborhood in town built in the early 1990s...follows all the characteristics: Brick or stone veneer façade? Check. Multiple roof line façades? Check. Lack of mature trees? Check, although the city never had any "large, mature trees" due to poor soil. Lack of porches? Check, unless you count a small sheltered area near the front door a "porch". Large, unfinished attics? Can't tell. I've never snooped around upstairs. Walkways to nowhere? Check. Grand rooms? Check. However, there's usually two staircases...a sweeping, polished staircase in the grand room entrance, and a functional, less grand staircase in the back. Is that common?

these were listed as sources in "Persian palace" article which has been redirected here.

• Alexander, Karen. "The Big-Box Battle of Beverly Hills." Los Angeles Times, 13 June 2004.
• Groves, Martha. "No Rhapsody on Roxbury." Los Angeles Times, 12 August 2005.
• Mitchell, John. "Wave of Wealthy Iranians No Ordinary Group of Immigrants." Los Angeles Times, 4 January 1990.
• Moaveni, Azadeh. "Councilman Plays Role of Cultural Mediator." Los Angeles Times, 19 April 2004.

Personally, I'm not a fan of McMansions at all. That said, this article strikes me as very POV. Yes, McMansion is (usually) a pejorative term. And no, I'm not trying to defend them. But the article seems like every sentence is taking a dig at McMansions, instead of explaining what they are. Moreover, even if a McMansion uses the finest quality building materials, it's still a McMansion. It's not so much about quality as it is about size and architectural design, coupled with (oftentimes) very large lots with huge front and/or backyards surrounding the house itself. This article spends too much time highlighting the "cheapness" of the McMansion, trying too hard to drill home the point that McMansions are bad. Shouldn't it be a bit more neutral? 73.194.85.220 (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone other than McMansion owners hate them, and it's easy to gang up on them, but the article is just a big POV rant against them. I've done some minor clean up but the article is pretty trash. Large sections need to be re-written and better sources need to be found. No tumblr blogs are not sources. Harizotoh9 (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hay — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.144.190.102 (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]