Talk:Max Beckmann
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advert
[edit]is it me or is the last section one great ADVERT for the books mentioned
This isn't an article about the book, so that should be started up as a separate article. I have revised considerable sections of the current article, as the whole thing reads like an advert at the moment. Genuine enthusiasm, no doubt, but not the NPOV which Wikipedia strives to attain. Let's have more facts and less gush. Tyrenius 00:11, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Note
[edit]Please note that not all names that end in -man (-mann) are Jewish as some people assume. *Look for sources before adding the Prefix 'Jewish-XXian' to a biography. Antidote 02:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
Expressionism
[edit]Not all of the -manns are Jews; most of them are NOT. Not all of the German artists are expressionists; most of them are NOT. And Beckmann was NOT an expresso at all! He disliked them!
Deutschmann
The fact that Beckmann disliked Expressionists should be noted, but the fact is that historically he is classified as an Expressionist and is included under that title in art history surveys. This is due to his distortion of form to expressive ends. See current ARTnews for typical usage: "If you have room for one German Expressionist, explains Sinaiko, the nod may go to Ernst Ludwig Kirchner rather than Max Beckmann,in part because the Beckmann estate usually charges more for reproduction rights." ARTnews online
Tyrenius 11:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me, bus this is bullshit by people from outside of Germany who don't know what German Expressionism is.
Deutschmann
However, this is what they say, and Wiki is here to record these different points of view. I suggest you start a section in the article where this can be examined, and we can put these points of view, showing what does and doesn't constitute Expressionism. Wiki does not exist to put personal points of view. Please cite your references and sources for what you are saying. Thanks.
Tyrenius 16:22, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi Deutschmann
Every book and article I have seen in the UK classifies Beckmann as an Expressionist. It would be interesting and informative if you could supply Beckmann's words on this, with any art historians who do not put him in this category. In Germany what is he classified as?
Tyrenius 20:24, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- These books are wrong; no German art historian labelled Beckmann an expressionist. He is considered a class of his own.
- JohnFoxIII 14:35, 25 June 2006
That may well be the case, but wikipedia policy is verifiable sources, i.e.:
- "Verifiability" in this context does not mean that editors are expected to verify whether, for example, the contents of a New York Times article are true. In fact, editors are strongly discouraged from conducting this kind of research, because original research may not be published in Wikipedia. Articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources, regardless of whether individual editors view that material as true or false. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is thus verifiability, not truth.
Thus if many books classify him as an Expressionist, that is to be stated. If other books state he is not, then that should also be included. Tyrenius 00:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Notes on Beckmann's Technique and Personality
[edit]Max deliberately used the basic over and under painting techniques(glaze, wash, and scumble) developed in the Renaissance. This indirect method did not suit the painters of Die Brucke, who prefered so called direct painting that is ussually associated with the Impressionists and the ala prima work done by Franz Hals. In technique and spirit, a closer comparison could be made between Max Beckmann and Oskar Kokoshka, since they were both more cosmopolitan than any of the men in Die Brucke. Only in Beckmann's woodcuts can a direct comparison be made to Die Brucke. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VKlaatu (talk • contribs) .
- Good points - put them in the article! Tyrenius 06:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
M.B. influenced Jackson Pollack??
[edit]This states he strongly influenced Jackson Pollack. I have read a lot about Beckmann, and a little about Pollack, without coming across this. Beckmann had some work shown in America before Jackson's mature style emerged in the early 1940s, so it's not impossible this is true. But it calls for a reference. The idea that he influenced Guston is more credible. Some of Guston's pre-abstract paintings resemble Beckmann's in their arbitrary space and strange, angular compositions, and sophisticated painting technique, but I don't recall him mentioning Beckmann in his painting classes. This too could use a reference. Beckman's influence on American painting was probably strongest in Boston, among the generation of "Boston Expressionists" who were mostly born in the then-Jewish neighborhood of Roxbury around 1920. But even in Boston, Morton Sacks is perhaps the only artist to work in a style directly derived from Beckmann's. - Chelydra
Peer review?
[edit]I wonder if this article might benefit from some kind of peer review by a professional art historian. Aside from the claim that Beckmann "profoundly influenced" Jackson Pollack, there's a bothersome reference to "Magic Realists" working in the 15th and 16th Centuries. Beckmann deserves the kind of enthusiasm that runs through this article, but it could be backed up by some more meticulous scholarship. - Chelydra
Walking Directions
[edit]The article seems very precise about the location of Beckmann's apartment (69th Street) and of his fatal heart attack (61st Street), but then offers the suggestion that he was walking from his apartment to the Metropolitan Museum of Art when he died - except that he would have been walking downtown, and the Metropolitan is uptown. Perhaps there's just too much precision here, certainly too much for the level of accuracy attained. Dropo59tx (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Max Beckmann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060110110026/http://web.grinnell.edu:80/art/gexp/essays/beckmann.html to http://web.grinnell.edu/art/gexp/essays/beckmann.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070829212931/http://www.tate.org.uk:80/modern/exhibitions/beckmann/ to http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/beckmann/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050211143227/http://www.press.uchicago.edu:80/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/13174.ctl to http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/13174.ctl
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:29, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Download pictures
[edit]Can anyone tell me if its allowed to download the pictures? Especially "The Night"? It is just stated there that its forbidden to UPload pictures, but what about the downloading (for personal use on the pc only)? Thanks alot — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malzkorn (talk • contribs) 13:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Max Beckmann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140315201908/http://www.guggenheim.org/new-york/collections/collection-online/artists/bios/1211 to http://www.guggenheim.org//new-york/collections/collection-online/artists/bios/1211
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.