This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Yesterday, I made the exact same pace on a Dutch wikipedia site. My article was removed within 24 hours, because I wrote it in English. Today, I reposted my article on a English Wikipedia page, so I hope it will not get removed again. Hoever, the odd thing is that when I search on the Dutch Google for "Material Passport", I don't get a hit on the English page of my article. I only find the record of the removed page on the Dutch Wikipedia page. How so? Michelandreas (talk) 09:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Last week I got a message that I have to improve this page in order not to be deleted. So, I hope someone can control if this page is correct for now?

It takes about a week or so for search engines to change and it may appear then. However, I have tagged this as promotional and may be deleted soon because there's nothing particularly convincing and instead looks like a travel guide or otherwise how-to. I would suggest adding only the basic and necessary information and no "Advantages and Disadvantages" sections and anything else that belongs at a travel guide or information source, instead of an encyclopedia. SwisterTwister talk 17:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For this webpage, Material passport, there is a section called Projects.

Its two current subheadings are NL (for Netherlands) and EU (for European Union).

I suggest deletion of these subheadings and combination of the bullet points all together, alphabetically.

The Netherlands is obviously in the EU anyway, so duplication/ redundancy. Also, it is not clear why a geography needs to be used in the first place.

I suggest that the simpler and better solution is not to have geographical subheadings here, and that they be deleted. RobertoFanfuli (talk) 11:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After detailing this suggested change here on Talk and getting no responses to my proposed change over a 13 days period, I have now implemented the change in the absence of any dissenting voices to it, Roberto Fanfuli RobertoFanfuli (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of this page there is a heading for See Also. Under that there is a link to Digital Product Passport which redirects to the Produce traceability page on Wikipedia, instead.Produce traceability - Wikipedia

I suggest that a page should be developed for Digital Product Passport - I assume that there is no such page? I cannot see one. Such a page would easily, IMHO, meet the notability test.

And that a link should also be provided directly and explicitly (i.e. named as such) to Produce traceability - Wikipedia

I also note that there is a bullet point near the top of this page for "Product passport" (with a citation but no onward Wikipedia link). This is similar to Digital Product Passport in name and in meaning. Some tidying up to do here, I suggest.

Thoughts? Many thanks, Roberto RobertoFanfuli (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]