This article was nominated for deletion on 12 July 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Citizendium Porting (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Citizendium Porting, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Citizendium PortingWikipedia:WikiProject Citizendium PortingTemplate:WikiProject Citizendium PortingCitizendium Porting articles

I don't even know what the hell I'm reading. --Slimy goop (talk) 10:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article talks about the subject to praise them, and is not from a neutral perspective and is not encyclopedic

Fivework (talk) 01:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: For now I've removed the Analysis section. I think it needs to be completely reworked in order to be encyclopedic. ––FormalDude ^talk 05:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, it definitely violates NPOV and MOS:WEASEL. It's taken from Citizendium, but even there it doesn't have any references; I think its inclusion on Wikipedia probably violates NOR. I think going forward, we should first focus on building up the concrete history of the oration, and then include an analysis later. Eunakria (talk) 05:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]