This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fire Emblem article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find video game sources: "Fire Emblem" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 555 days

	Fire Emblem has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	Fire Emblem is the main article in the Main Fire Emblem series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 18, 2007 Good article nominee Listed August 31, 2007 Peer review Reviewed June 5, 2017 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Nintendo Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nintendo task force. This article has had a peer review which is now archived. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Harry M. Rubin (2 participants) Atelier Double (1 participant) IGN Convention (3 participants) Vector Unit (3 participants) Anton Rayne (10 participants) Darkworks (4 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Home video game console generations (discussion) HoYoverse (discussion) Minecraft – Volume Beta (discussion) Monster Hunter World: Iceborne (discussion) Forge (level editor) (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Teardown (nom) Mario Party DS (nom) Good article nominations Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (nom) Donkey Kong (start) Laura Matsuda (nom) Puff-puff (Dragon Quest) (start) Sorceress (Dragon's Crown) (start) Yume Nikki: Dream Diary (nom) Hyper Duel (start) Fortnite Festival (nom) Bonfire (Dark Souls) (nom) Gengar (start) Laika: Aged Through Blood (start) Leifang (start) Megamania (start) Barry Burton (start) Tina Armstrong (start) Little Samson (start) Geno (Super Mario RPG) (nom) Rockstar North (start) Birdo (start) Clustertruck (start) I am Setsuna (start) Rayman (video game) (start) DYK nominations Barry Burton Jacob Geller Goodboy Galaxy Reviews and reassessments The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom) Pokémon Channel (nom) Amiga Format (rev) Kim Kitsuragi (rev) Undertale (rev) Articles that need... assessment (0) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (8) infoboxes (7) cover art (242) screenshots (8,803) photos (63) translation from japan (185) creation merging Media franchises Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: "ゴチャキャラバトルSLG『ファーストクイーン』のリメイク版『FirstQueen1NEXT』がiOS/Androidで配信開始。今回は2部隊でさらに多くのキャラが活躍". GameCast. 27 June 2000. Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2018-09-11. http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/feature/2016-03-11/how-fire-emblem-became-a-phenomenon/.99657 http://gamasutra.com/view/news/301887/7_great_tactical_RPGs_that_every_developer_should_study.php https://web.archive.org/web/20140302145505/http://www.nintendo.co.jp/fe/sound_museum/index.html

Shouldn't there be something about the reported threat of cancellation prior to the release, critical acclaim, and tremendous success of Fire Emblem Awakening? Here's a source.

7:07, Sakurai says that Three Houses is the 17th game in the series and that Heroes is not a spin-off. ^[1]

 Done. Maestro2016 (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only noticed now, but no, this is dumb, I've reverted. A YouTube video of somebody who doesn't even work on Fire Emblem is not remotely a good source compared to voluminous sourcing elsewhere that calls Heroes a spin-off. This wasn't even close to a good source, I certainly hope you aren't using random videos of non-authorities on a topic in such a cavalier fashion elsewhere. SnowFire (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the Games section of the article, we find the sentence "Fates was later re-released as a special version with all three versions included." I believe this is false; the special version in question refers to the Special Edition, which was released at the launch of the game and was actually the only way to play Revelations for the first few weeks after launch. I don't believe there's any other version that contains all three paths, but even if there is, failing to mention the original special edition (which is also the only way to have Revelations physically) seems like an oversight. I can't make the edit myself, as I've never edited Wikipedia and the article is currently semi-protected, but I figured I'd mention it here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:601:AEA0:0:0:0:5644 (talk) 19:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]