Down a Dark Hall has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 2, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Children's literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks you can do: edit history watch purge Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add ((Portal|Children's literature)) to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with ((WikiProject Children's literature)) Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject. References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article edit Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Down a Dark Hall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 03:44, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Overall, a very good article. Just have a few things I would like to see.

Perhaps add a little more to the lead about its background? For example, the feminist issue sounds interesting.

I went ahead and added that to the lead. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A couple sentences in the Reception section could be paraphrased.

I paraphrased the one quote from The New York Times. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any information on the sales for the book, or box office results for the film?

I couldn't find any information about the sales for the book. I did however find box office results, so I included them in the article. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, BOM, of course. I could have just as well added that myself, haha. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 10:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One link redirects to a different website (I'm guessing it was a name change). It was DVD Talk, which is now Top Seven Reviews (I'm not sure if it's reliable however). There's also at least one dead link, though I have since archived the sources.

I can't find the reference you're referring to. What's the title of the article? Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Abryn: Thanks for reviewing the article, it's really appreciated. How does it look now? Fearstreetsaga (talk) 01:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I dunno what the heck I was thinking, I must have gotten my wires crossed and mistook a source from another article as being from this one. Many apologies! The article looks good, nice job on this. I'm ready to pass. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 10:08, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]