This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

South Africa: Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the South African politics task force. Television This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Journalism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This show is no doubt very good and very important; however, such gems as

"In a continent of 53 countries and thousands of cultures and languages, it is vital that there is a unifying force."

"With live web chats, interactive guides, polls and discussion forums, viewers are brought closer to the stories that affect them."

the article gets a little mushy and opinionated. --Lionelbrits 04:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I've trimmed a lot of the mushy stuff. It's a single-editor article and I've put ((fact)) tags next to a number of statements that need citations. These are mostly about awards, stats and viewership. The awards should be easy to cite, and hopefully there's a source for viewership figures. Some of the stats might be available on a brag page on the Carte Blanche website and if not, they shouldn't be published here. I'm not sure if all the stats are notable either. Zaian 22:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The original author works for Carte Blanche--Magnito 10:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been renamed from Carte Blanche to Carte Blanche (TV series) as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 18:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any specific reason why all the references are inline, and not using the standard ^[1] format? I was tempted to change them all, but wasn't sure if there was a specific reason the original editors didn't go with that format. --GrahamDo (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]