This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Feminism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Gender studies Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention Magazines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Oregon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical). Spoken Wikipedia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://books.google.com/books?id=LvuCDQAAQBAJ https://www.wired.com/2012/11/suckerfish-google-apps/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/femteacher.24.1-2.0043

i think bitch should be spelled lower case Bitch >> bitch and that it should be reffered to as simply as Bitch and not Bitch magazene in the thumb image boxes Qrc2006 02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• support both changes Qrc2006 02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. (sorta) (maybe not completely, but it's a start). --97.124.112.237 (talk) 07:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does the current article strike anyone else as sounding far too much like a promotional summary? Crito2161 02:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. In fact, it doesn't just strike anyone reading it as such, it bitch slaps them with the self promotional.

The book cited as a reference is not independent of the subject. VegetativePup (talk) 02:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a number of secondary sources that could be included. I'm removing this as a candidate for deletion. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/09/03/andi_zeisler_and_lisa_jervis/ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/magazine/06wwln_q4.html http://articles.sfgate.com/2006-08-20/books/17308903_1_pop-culture-social-change-anthology http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=feminist_media_in_a_time_of_economic_trouble http://eastbaymonthly.com/kilduff-02-07.html http://motherjones.com/politics/1998/01/lewinsky-affair http://www.msmagazine.com/winter2004/thirdwave.asp

--75.148.87.230 (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Currently the only footnote in the "Mission Statement" section, is footnote [6] which says [quote! from the wikitext]: "<ref>an email from Jaymee Jacoby</ref>". Is it me, or does that seem a bit strange, for a source for a footnote in a Wikipedia article? It does not even give the [time and] date of the e-mail message. It does specify the sender, and the recipient is probably not necessary to document -- (I guess.) Just my 0.02; Any comments? --97.124.112.237 (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure but is this the same magazine as bitchmedia.org?

If so I suspect the currently listed URL (bitchmagazine.org) is wrong.

Please advise. ~ 99.146.242.37 (talk) 11:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This post is to second this comment. I am not an account holder on wikipedia or any kind of editor, but the "official site" link is wrong. It redirect to a live blog. The official site is still currently active at bitchmedia.org 135.23.42.175 (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be correct, I've updated the link. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 23:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]