This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Low‑importance This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This overlaps a little with Bathonian. Is it the same thing? I know nothing about the topic; I just came across this while doing Encyclopaedia Britannica Eleventh Edition cleanup. It seems likely to me that the current article (verbatim from EB1911) would need to be updated in any case (surely the geological descriptions aren't current?) Bathonian itself doesn't include the detailed history and geography though. I expect it would require a geology geek to take this article's text and update it before merging. David Brooks (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've just come across this article from Bath stone which has some related material and might be significant for any merge.— Rod ^talk 14:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bath Stone (with or without an upper case 's' for stone) is a particular type of rock from a particular part of the world whereas Bathonian denotes a geological age in use all around the world. I think Bathonian Series could be merged with Bathonian - I do dislike these articles with Encyclopaedia Britannica 1911 material - they are so often so outdated as to be quite misleading. cheers Geopersona (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]