This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Denmark Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello Denmark!

Warm greetings from India 🇮🇳🇮🇳 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.99.35.116 (talk) 13:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This work comes from an old public domain resource; fell free to expand, update, wikify, etc. --KQ

I will be having a go at this and ancillary pages over the coming weeks since I am in Aalborg atm Sjc 12:17, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Regarding the text: Aalborg traces its history back over 1000 years, settled originally by the Vikings as a trading post because of its position on the Limfjord. The site of what were two Viking settlements, and a visible burial ground is to be seen on a hill overlooking the city, Lindholm Høje, and the size of these settlements emphasise the significance of this place as a crossing point.

Is there any written sources or archelogogy excavations showing vikings had anything with this trading post to do, and that there was a viking settlement? Is the word viking mentioned, or is this just a free speculation? Dan Koehl 11:50, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Excavations show that the burial site at Lindholm Høje was used from about 600 AD to 1000 AD. So it was certainly used by Vikings in the sense of Viking Age North Germanic people. I do not believe there are any signs of Vikings in the sense of raiders/pirates.

Rasmus (talk) 12:27, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Hmmm. Are there any sources mentioning viking trade posts? Or, was it just "no-viking but viking age" trade posts? Is there any particulair point in making this town founded by vikings, if it wasnt, and more vikingish than the other hundreds of towns in scandinavia, if it was founded just by normal people living, fishing and trading there? Dan Koehl

Viking age is not same as vikings, and theres no source mentioning vikings founding Aahlborg, so I remove the sentence. Dan Koehl 13:57, 16 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Aalborg article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.
Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add ((User:LinkBot/suggestions/Aalborg)) to this page. — LinkBot 00:55, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

An automated Wikipedia link suggester has suggested 5 possible wiki links for the Aalborg article:

Notes

The article text has not been changed in any way; Some of these suggestions may be wrong, some may be right; Any edits to this page will be lost when LinkBot is next run.

Feedback

I like it, I hate it, Please don't link to — LinkBot 00:55, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Can link the south bank: ...s also the chief town of the county of [[North Jutland]] on the south bank of the [[Limfjord]], which connects the [[North Sea]] and t...
• Can link middle ages: ...e ''Alabu'', is found on a coin dated to 1040. During the middle ages, Aalborg prospered and became one of the largest cities in ... (link to section)
• Can link town privileges: ... granted a [[monopoly]] in salt herring. Aalborg received town privileges in [[1342]] and the bishopric dates from [[1554]].... (link to section)
• Can link Our Lady: ...f the [[18th century]], while ''Vor Frue Kirke'' (Church of Our Lady) was partially burnt in [[1894]], but the foundation of bot... (link to section)
• Can link road bridge: ...he Limfjord is [[Nørresundby]], connected with Aalborg by a road bridge, by an iron railway bridge as well as by a motorwaytunnel u... (link to section) - I'm game. Rich Farmbrough, 07:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]