This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Merseyside Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Buckinghamshire (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles Highways: United Kingdom Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force. Cheshire Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Hertfordshire (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hertfordshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HertfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject HertfordshireTemplate:WikiProject HertfordshireHertfordshire articles

This article is a bit too wordy for me, which is why I've added the ((essay-entry)) template. See A1 and A66 for good examples of how a roads article should be laid out, and not simply a narrative of all its waypoints, which is not useful for an encyclopedia. See wp:mos. — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 20:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Half of this section is talking about the Watford-Tring stretch. Jonknight73 (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The new sign on the M40 southbound exit slip at J9 has Bicester A41 on a white panel which either means a) the sign-writer has messed up, or b) the A41 has had its primary status removed.

Cannot find any news about b) but if anybody does know about it, the picture of the route number will need updating. Tonybourtonville (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The contractors for the J9 scheme have admitted that they got the signing wrong, so the A41 is still a primary route Tonybourtonville (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on A41 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added ((dead link)) tag to http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/ontheagenda?articleid=2137371
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090622025155/http://www.bupahospitals.co.uk:80/solihull to http://www.bupahospitals.co.uk/solihull
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061003064353/http://www.heartsol.wmids.nhs.uk/ to http://www.heartsol.wmids.nhs.uk
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927083955/http://www.solihull.gov.uk/section.asp?catid=200259&docid=938 to http://www.solihull.gov.uk/section.asp?catid=200259&docid=938
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060909114351/http://www.nhs.uk:80/england/hospitals/showhospital.aspx?id=5MV02 to http://www.nhs.uk/England/Hospitals/ShowHospital.aspx?id=5MV02
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060118183705/http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk:80/articles/Tettenhall/tetten06.htm to http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/articles/Tettenhall/tetten06.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020821061546/http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk:80/~slb/fords/Shakeford.htm to http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~slb/fords/Shakeford.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100126043347/http://www.highways.gov.uk:80/roads/projects/3785.aspx to http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/projects/3785.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on A41 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070221034204/http://www.ewgreen.org.uk/solihull-11.htm to http://www.ewgreen.org.uk/solihull-11.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://web.archive.org/web/20090622025155/http%3A//www.bupahospitals.co.uk%3A80/solihull
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://web.archive.org/web/20060909114351/http%3A//www.nhs.uk%3A80/england/hospitals/showhospital.aspx?id=5MV02
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://web.archive.org/web/20060118183705/http%3A//www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk%3A80/articles/Tettenhall/tetten06.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://web.archive.org/web/20020821061546/http%3A//www.cs.bham.ac.uk%3A80/~slb/fords/Shakeford.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://web.archive.org/web/20100126043347/http%3A//www.highways.gov.uk%3A80/roads/projects/3785.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A41 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100922221129/http://cbrd.co.uk/futures/scheme.php?id=72 to http://www.cbrd.co.uk/futures/scheme.php?id=72

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have changed the formatting on the major junctions section of the infobox. Roads4117 (talk) 16:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03/02 Update: As of February 3, I have made the infobox be motorways only. Roads4117 (talk) 09:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

an somebody create Template:Attached KML/A41 road ? 92.71.60.62 (talk) 15:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]