Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HawkAussie (talk · contribs) 12:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will be happy to take this review for you.

Just as a note, the reason why I haven't already nominated this for GA was that it doesn't have a tournament summary (I have been putting it off). Nominator has never actually edited the page in question. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I have done a quick look through the quick fail criteria and this feels like this is a quick fail as critera 3 isn't current satisfied enough to have a good review of it as it's missing a key component with that being the tournament summary and other sections not having references to back it up with the bottom paragraph missing a reference and also can see some few ciation needed as well. This plus the fact that the nominator hasn't done any edits says to me that they ain't ready to do this massive task of fixing it up. HawkAussie (talk) 10:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]