This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Years Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Right now, we have two pages for every century: the overview (16th century) and the Year in Review (Year in Review 16th Century). This has the effect that these pages have to crosslink in an awkward manner, and that every year page (1642) has to link to two different pages for the same century.

I propose that we merge the two pages for every century by simply adding the table of decades and years to the overview page, like I did here for the 15th century. Eventually, we could completely get rid of the Year in Review pages (the title is not very descriptive and trademarked). This would simplify Centuries as well as all individual year pages.

Comments?

AxelBoldt, Saturday, June 29, 2002

I think that's a great idea. --LC, Saturday, June 29, 2002

Which commonwealth? JackyR 00:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_1/pico.html
  • In 15th century on 2011-05-25 01:50:43, Socket Error: 'No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it'
  • In 15th century on 2011-06-01 18:44:26, Socket Error: 'No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it'

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It repeats information about Columbus twice. Viriditas (talk) 20:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]