This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 101st Airborne Division article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 100 days

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States / World War II / Cold War / Post-Cold War C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Post-Cold War task force United States: Kentucky High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as High-importance).

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mickeymaitre.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this page listed on Wikipedia:Links to disambiguating pages (0-9)?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jaberwocky6669 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 26 June 2005.

There's a new entry under notables for Bryan Isaac Clyde. He's a shooting wannabe who was killed before he hurt anyone by federal officers. He doesn't have a page except for a redirect; clicking on his name will take you to the page about the event. I'm tempted to delete the entry but am soliciting comment first.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 21:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you know what standard procedure is with regiments/divisions? I know that with universities we do include the murderers and notable terrorist wannabes in the alumni list. cf. List of The Evergreen State College people#Criminals.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• I see your point there, but Clyde himself doesn't have a page.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 21:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No page = not notable. --A D Monroe III^(talk) 22:44, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which type of article could be used for that? I was thinking, maybe a review? I don't know. It's a quite known saga from a famous developer though it's been years without any new game on the saga. The games' pages have no reference about the plot either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.141.48.136 (talk) 23:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]