Pxr sRNA
| Pxr sRNA | |
|---|---|
 Secondary structure of Pxr sRNA. | |
| Identifiers | |
| Symbol | Pxr |
| Rfam | RF01812 |
| Other data | |
| RNA type | sRNA |
| Domain(s) | Myxococcus xanthus, Stigmatella aurantiaca |
| PDB structures | PDBe |
Pxr sRNA is a regulatory RNA which downregulates genes responsible for the formation of fruiting bodies in Myxococcus xanthus.[1] Fruiting bodies are aggregations of myxobacteria formed when nutrients are scarce,[2] the fruiting bodies permit a small number of the aggregated colony to transform into stress-resistant spores.[3]
Pxr exists in two forms: Pxr-L (a long form) and Pxr-S which is shorter. The short form was found to be expressed in cells during growth but is rapidly repressed during starvation. This finding implies that Pxr-S is specifically responsible for inhibiting the fruiting body development during cell growth when nutrients are abundant.[1]
Pxr homologs have only been found in one other taxon, namely Stigmatella aurantiaca. Homologs were not found in any other myxobacteria (such as Sorangium cellulosum[4] or Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans[5]) which suggests the Pxr RNA gene may have a recent evolutionary origin in the sub-clade Myxococcales.[1]
PxR sRNA folds into 3 steam loops. SL1 and SL 2 are highly conserved across mycobacteria and SL1 is necessary for the regulatory function. However, a conserved eight-base-pair segment of the variable SL3 is necessary for PxR accumulation and multicellular development.[6]
M. xanthus obligate cheat and phoenix phenotypes
[edit]Several mutations in the Pxr sRNA gene have been observed.[7] The first mutation causes an obligate cheat (OC) phenotype to emerge, these bacteria exploit the fruiting bodies of wild-type M. xanthus to sporulate more efficiently. This phenotype is thought to be caused by a mutation which prevents the repression of Pxr-S, thereby inhibiting the formation of fruiting bodies indefinitely. If Pxr-S is derived from Pxr-L, it may be that RNAi-like processing elements have been knocked out.[1]
In a laboratory experiment, the OC phenotype out-competed and excluded the wild type, eventually bringing about a population crash when there were not enough wild type bacteria to exploit.[7] After this event, a new phenotype emerged via spontaneous mutation dubbed phoenix (PX).[1] The PX phenotype was developmentally superior to both OC and wt, it was able to sporulate autonomously - without forming fruiting bodies and with high efficiency.[7] Two-component system operon (histidine kinase gene and a σ54 response regulator) is associated with production and processing of Pxr sRNA.[8]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e Yu YT, Yuan X, Velicer GJ (May 2010). "Adaptive evolution of an sRNA that controls Myxococcus development". Science. 328 (5981): 993. doi:10.1126/science.1187200. PMC 3027070. PMID 20489016.
- ^ Kuner JM, Kaiser D (July 1982). "Fruiting body morphogenesis in submerged cultures of Myxococcus xanthus". J. Bacteriol. 151 (1): 458–461. doi:10.1128/jb.151.1.458-461.1982. PMC 220259. PMID 6806248.
- ^ Wireman JW, Dworkin M (February 1977). "Developmentally induced autolysis during fruiting body formation by Myxococcus xanthus". J. Bacteriol. 129 (2): 798–802. doi:10.1128/jb.129.2.798-802.1977. PMC 235013. PMID 402359.
- ^ Schneiker S, Perlova O, Kaiser O, et al. (November 2007). "Complete genome sequence of the myxobacterium Sorangium cellulosum". Nat. Biotechnol. 25 (11): 1281–1289. doi:10.1038/nbt1354. PMID 17965706.
- ^ Thomas SH, Wagner RD, Arakaki AK, et al. (2008). "The mosaic genome of Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans strain 2CP-C suggests an aerobic common ancestor to the delta-proteobacteria". PLOS ONE. 3 (5): e2103. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002103. PMC 2330069. PMID 18461135.
- ^ Yu, Yuen-Tsu N.; Cooper, Elizabeth; Velicer, Gregory J. (2017-11-13). "A conserved stem of the Myxococcus xanthus sRNA Pxr controls sRNA accumulation and multicellular development". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 15411. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15439-w. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5684412. PMID 29133885.
- ^ a b c Fiegna F, Yu YT, Kadam SV, Velicer GJ (May 2006). "Evolution of an obligate social cheater to a superior cooperator". Nature. 441 (7091): 310–314. doi:10.1038/nature04677. PMID 16710413. S2CID 4371886.
- ^ Yu, Yuen-Tsu N.; Kleiner, Manuel; Velicer, Gregory J. (December 1, 2016). "Spontaneous Reversions of an Evolutionary Trait Loss Reveal Regulators of a Small RNA That Controls Multicellular Development in Myxobacteria". Journal of Bacteriology. 198 (23): 3142–3151. doi:10.1128/JB.00389-16. ISSN 1098-5530. PMC 5105895. PMID 27621281.
Further reading
[edit]- Stefani G, Slack FJ (March 2008). "Small non-coding RNAs in animal development". Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9 (3): 219–230. doi:10.1038/nrm2347. PMID 18270516. S2CID 5470510.
- Gottesman S (July 2005). "Micros for microbes: non-coding regulatory RNAs in bacteria". Trends Genet. 21 (7): 399–404. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.391.8944. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.05.008. PMID 15913835.
- Chen, IC; Griesenauer, B; Yu, YT; Velicer, GJ (Jan 10, 2014). "A recent evolutionary origin of a bacterial small RNA that controls multicellular fruiting body development". Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution. 73: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.01.001. hdl:20.500.11850/80648. PMID 24418530.
External links
[edit]Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
